New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Prodigal Mind

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Our minds are built to wander, according to a new study that argues we have a network of brain regions dedicated to meandering thoughts that turns off and on depending on how focused we need to be to complete different tasks.

Previous studies have shown that this “default” network, which is composed of at least seven separate brain regions, kicks in anytime we are at rest—say, passively taking in a TV show or a sunset. But the function of letting our gray matter go gallivanting has been unclear.

Now Malia F. Mason of Harvard Medical School and her colleagues have found that dull or unchallenging tasks switch on the default network. They scanned the brains of several subjects while their memory of short sequences of letters was being evaluated. When tested on a familiar set of letters that the subjects had been trained on for days—boring!—their daydreaming networks switched into overdrive. But when they had to focus on sorting out new combinations of letters, the networks fell quiet. This pattern matched each person's own reports of when his or her mind wandered from the tasks.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We’re constantly doing things that are pretty mundane,” Mason says. She points out that daydreaming is not always frivolous: “Most people say they’re planning or thinking about the future, and that's extremely adaptive.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe