New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

The Remembrance of Fruits Past

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Color lives in the memories, as well as the eyes, of the beholder, suggests a German study of how people perceive the color, or colorlessness, of fruit. Karl Gegenfurtner and his colleagues at Justus-Liebig University in Giessen put their subjects in front of a computer screen with digital images of fruits—a banana, for example—in brown, purple or any arbitrary color. The subjects were then instructed to use the computer's software to manipulate the fruits' color. When asked to make a gray—or colorless—banana, all 14 subjects made images that were slightly blue.

“In order for the banana to look a neutral gray, they had to make it bluish,” Gegenfurtner says, “because a gray banana still looked yellow to them.” The actual deviation from neutral gray varied between 4 and 13 percent, but all of them added blue, yellow's complimentary color (the one opposite it on a color wheel) to the images to make them look gray.

But why should our brains distort our perception of color rather than representing it truly? “Our brain uses the knowledge that stop signs and strawberries are red, for example, to recognize them, even when they are barely illuminated by dim moonlight,” Gegenfurtner explains. In effect, the brain adds red to make them recognizable, adjusting their real color toward a “memory color.” The researchers also point out that even in daylight this color adjustment has a purpose. Sunshine contains more blue in the morning, and yellow fruits would shift their appearance toward gray in those conditions. But because of the influence of color memory, bananas appear to have a more consistent hue throughout the day.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe