New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

The Ripple Effect

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The February 11, 2016, announcement that scientists had successfully detected gravitational waves was a historic moment for physics. To be sure, the confirmation of Albert Einstein’s 100-year-old prediction sent ripples of excitement even beyond the scientific community. But that was just the beginning. Researchers have quickly logged additional records of gravitational waves using the advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) and a second wave detector called Virgo in Italy. As Davide Castelvecchi reports for our sister publication Nature (see “Here Come the Waves”), these and future observations will start yielding insights into the origins of black holes, the extreme anatomy of neutron stars, the structure and pattern of galaxies, and Einstein’s general theory of relativity. “Gravitational waves might even provide a window into what happened in the first few moments after the big bang,” Castelvecchi writes. It is indeed an exciting time for physics and cosmology.

Elsewhere in this issue Lee Billings reports on the progress on the great hunt for our solar system’s missing planet (see “Looking for Planet Nine, Astronomers Gaze into the Abyss”), and the world says goodbye to one of the greatest minds in physics (see “Stephen Hawking: The Universe Does Not Forget, and Neither Will We”).

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Space & Physics Vol 1 Issue 2This article was published with the title “The Ripple Effect” in SA Space & Physics Vol. 1 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican062018-5uOJxBCiV3UAdf0vXbih9d

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe