The Science of Doing Good

Information technology, satellite imaging and research carried out in disaster-relief areas have begun to transform humanitarian aid into a more efficient and less haphazard endeavor

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the span of a few days in the spring of 1999, hundreds of thousands of ethnic Albanians fled their homes in Kosovo as Serbian forces drove them into neighboring countries. At the time, I was a new medical school graduate put in charge of triaging sick and injured refugees who showed up in a constant stream at an improvised medical aid station in the cold, muddy no-man’s-land between Kosovo and Macedonia. As I stood there, I could see thousands of men, women and children who had trudged across the border or arrived in trucks, cars, horse-drawn carts or the arms of fellow refugees. Their numbers taxed the ability of overstretched United Nations refugee officials to track them. Many families had been abruptly separated during the chaos of expulsion. Once inside the border in refugee camps, desperate mothers and fathers posted paper notes with names and descriptions of their missing children.

Soon after I began working, a new way to help that did not involve scraps of paper became available. Employees at Microsoft’s European headquarters in Paris, aware of the tragedy unfolding nearby, offered their services to the U.N. A few weeks after my arrival, I walked into a tent and found a Microsoft team photographing refugees and presenting them with computer-generated ID cards. The Microsoft workers hoped to register the refugees for food and shelter assistance and, through cross-checks made in these newly created databanks, to help locate lost family members.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe