The Science of Metacognition

Managing editor Sandra Upson introduces the September/October 2014 issue of Scientific American MIND

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Five years ago I heightened my self-knowledge—abruptly. I had flown to Moscow to meet an executive in charge of Russia's railroads, and a press officer had offered a translator. I declined, believing that my conversational Russian would suffice.

How wrong I was. Seated at a conference table in the executive's capacious office, I was struck dumb by the streams of technical jargon zooming past my ears. It was swine flu season, and I couldn't tell if my forehead burned more from shame or genuine fever. I yearned to slide under that grand old table and curl up for a nap.

Faulty metacognition—our judgments of our knowledge and memories—had led me to overrate my language skills and perform poorly at a key moment. In “The Power of Reflection,” cognitive neuroscientist Stephen M. Fleming explains how metacognition underpins success in all walks of life. Fortunately, several techniques, such as meditation, can deepen self-knowledge.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A shared vocabulary is one aspect of successful communication, but raconteurs also swap subtle signals to intimate their thoughts. We focus on these enigmatic elements in this issue's special report on language. As linguists Mark Dingemanse and N. J. Enfield write in “Let's Talk,” conversations everywhere share a unique rhythm, which is why silences can be packed with social meaning.

The language you speak—whether it is native or foreign—adds further social nuance. People tend to think more rationally when speaking a language other than their mother tongue, for example. Psychologist Catherine L. Caldwell-Harris explores the quirks of the multilingual mind in “Kill One to Save Five? Mais Oui!

As Dingemanse and Enfield note, we spend most of our waking hours interacting with others. These exchanges are vital to well-being. In particular, socializing in groups can help people combat depression and avoid relapse. Psychologists Tegan Cruwys, S. Alexander Haslam (an advisory board member) and Genevieve A. Dingle describe this healing effect in “The New Group Therapy.

As for my botched reporting trip, the saving grace was that I had taped the whole affair. My benevolent mother helped me decipher the bureaucratese. Yet for the presence of the tape recorder, I have to grudgingly thank my metacognition.

SA Mind Vol 25 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Know Thyself” in SA Mind Vol. 25 No. 5 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0914-1

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe