New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Search for Planet X, a Cosmic Quest and Better Lives on Earth

A preview by our editor in chief of the February 2016 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When we look up at the night sky, it's easy to appreciate how scientists have gained insights from the apparent movements of those twinkling orbs. But it's striking how much of astronomy involves looking for indirect clues to something unseen. As an undergraduate, I reflected on how Neptune revealed itself by subtly shifting the orbit of Uranus. Then Pluto was found when astronomers thought (incorrectly) that something was pulling on Uranus and Neptune.

Now, as staff editor Michael D. Lemonick writes, “Something very odd seems to be going on out beyond Pluto.” Could it be another hidden world? In our cover story, “The Search for Planet X,” Lemonick describes how “super Earths”—planets with up to roughly 10 times Earth's mass—could be circling the sun beyond our current range of discovery. Today they are too far to be detected, but perhaps future observatories could confirm them, if they exist. Meanwhile we can enjoy the tale of the hunt for the latest icy quarry in the cloud of objects beyond Neptune known as the Kuiper belt. Turn to page 30. And if you enjoy quests for objects in the night sky, after that you might jet to “My Life as a Comet Hunter,” where David H. Levy describes a “cosmic passion” that's lasted for the past 50 years.

In contrast to the expanding universe, Robert Engelman writes, “Earth is a finite place.” It's increasingly clear that our species must learn how to live within our means—whether it comes to energy, food, water or any other resource. One way we do that is to use less as a species. And fewer people use fewer resources.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We have been improving on that score, with a global average of 2.5 births per woman, about half the level of six decades ago. But challenges remain where populations are still rising steeply. In “Six Billion in Africa,” Engelman reports that fertility remains high in most of Africa's 54 countries—high enough that by 2100 the continent's 1.2 billion could swell to between three billion and 6.1 billion, adding further challenges to the economies and systems in some of the world's poorest regions. Giving women opportunities and choices over their lives has perhaps the greatest potential. As Engelman says, “The empowerment of women needs no demographic justification,” but it is nonetheless a critical factor in helping Africa move toward a more prosperous future.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 314 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Where Is Planet X?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 314 No. 2 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0216-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe