The Ship Challenge

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The challenge of the " American Navigation Club," offering a bet of 10,000 as a prize to the winning vessel, a Yankee ship against a British one, of 1,200 tons burden, to run from London to China and back, has not yet been accepted. It was to stand open for 30 days. The club, unwilling that England should so far forget her old chivalry, has extended the period for accepting the challenge, and will augment the stakes to 20,000, and give the British ship 14 days of a start. Is there not public spirit in all old England to accept this challenge? As this race does not involve high pressure steam, we hope to see the challenge taken up, or an offer made to race for love to test the relative speed of American and English built ships. A correspondent of the London Mechanics' Magazine criticised Mr. Griffith's work on ship-building, and insinuated that the English shipwrights were better acquainted with the science than the American ones. Here is an opportunity for him to prove it. He should exert himself to find some one te accept the challenge, when he does so he will find the stakes by calling on Mr. Peabody, in London

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 7This article was published with the title “The Ship Challenge” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 7 (), p. 54
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican10301852-54d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe