New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Spaces Between

Cells get all the glory, but the spaces surrounding them are important, too

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What's in a brain? Neurons, chemical messengers, electric signals—and a lot of empty space. The space between cells takes up a fifth of the volume inside our brains. And although all our thoughts and mental functions traffic through this vital region, scientists are just beginning to unlock its secrets.

Neurobiologists Charles Nicholson of New York University and Eva Syková of the Institute of Experimental Medicine in Prague have developed ways to probe the unseen intercellular space in the brain. By injecting tracers and tracking their diffusion through the living brains of rats and other animals, they have discovered that about 20 percent is extracellular space, filled with cerebrospinal fluid—the same liquid that surrounds and cushions the brain and spinal cord. Nicholson and colleagues also found that diffusion is slow because the many nooks and crannies between cells impede the flow of molecules as they enter microscopic blind alleys and become trapped. Through this pattern of diffusion, chemicals released by nerve cells build up to higher concentrations, which improves communication between neurons.

Syková and her colleagues are studying the way extracellular space changes with disease and aging. Conditions producing a lack of oxygen, such as stroke, shrink the extracellular space. As the space constricts, the diffusion of substances between cells slows, and toxic substances are concentrated, impeding recovery. Aging has the same effect, and the shrinkage may be linked to learning. When Syková compared elderly rats that were fast learners in a maze test with their slower-learning peers, she found that the quick learners had lost much less extracellular space.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe