The Steam Fire Engine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Another trial of the steam fire engine took place at Cincinnati a few days ago. Steam was raised in lour minutes from the time of lighting the fire, and in twelve minutes it was throwing a stream ot water through an inch and three-quarter nozzle, from 50 feet of hose, a distance of 238 feet. Six streams of water were thrown at one time, each of them better than firemen generally put upon a fire. The "Enquirer" says that the engine will throw water in sufficient quantities to do efficient service at a fire, no one who has seer, her work doubts for a moment. The great difficulty appears in the getting of her to fires. Being so cumbersome and heavy it is almost impossible to get her through the streets without cutting them up and destroying the bowldering. If one could be built lighter it wonld no doubt answer the purpose. The " Invention," a foreign scientific and mechanical journal, published in Paris, has the following paragraph, in the number for March, respecting Ericsson's Caloric Engine : -"The Scientific American, whose competency no one in the United States would dare to dispute upon such subjects, continues to exhibit much reserve respecting Ericsson's engine, which is now being subjected to experiment." [That reserve, the " Invention," will 'see,is completely lemoved.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 30This article was published with the title “The Steam Fire Engine” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 30 (), p. 234
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican04091853-234d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe