New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

The Teen Brain: Perils and Promise

A preview by our editor in chief of the June issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Listening to my 14-year-old daughter explain her writing assignment the other night, I was surprised to learn we both had similar homework. I was about to start this letter to introduce the current issue and its cover story, “The Amazing Teen Brain,” by psychiatrist Jay N. Giedd. Her essay was going to analyze the reasons behind the rash behavior of the famous star-crossed young lovers in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. As she explained, “Teenagers' brains are not fully developed yet, so they have a problem with impulse control.” As she dispassionately talked about the brains of people her own age, I was struck anew by how grown-up teens can seem.

At the same time, as we are reminded painfully and too frequently not only by fictional plays but also by real-world headlines, adolescents are uniquely vulnerable to risky behavior, leading to mishaps or to recruitment to violent ends as soldiers or even terrorists. A key question around the recent trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who was 19 at the time of the Boston Marathon bombing, for instance, was the degree to which he was under the influence of his 26-year-old brother, Tamerlan.

At root is a developmental mismatch between the mental networks that manage emotion, which shift rapidly at puberty, and those that handle so-called executive function, which mature in a person's 20s. Giedd also describes how an earlier onset of puberty in recent decades has extended this angst-ridden period.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The protracted maturation, however, beneficially creates prolonged plasticity—enabling teenagers' enviable leaps of cognition and adaptability, for example, to today's data-enriched world. Both traits have served our species well in the past. Now, as science provides a better understanding of this powerfully influential developmental window, society—from parents to policy leaders to youngsters themselves—can work together to support teens on their journey.

Rather than soaring into the future, the Space Launch System, a successor to the shuttle, has been called a “rocket to nowhere”—a congressional jobs program with little hope of actually flying to space. But in “Birth of a Rocket,” journalist David H. Freedman takes a look at how the system, which is on time and on budget for a 2018 flight, could actually become the vehicle of choice to reach Mars in about 25 years. Given the sufficient political will—no small hurdle—the teens of today could see humans step onto another planet.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 312 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Promises and Perils” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 312 No. 6 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0615-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe