New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

The Trump administration is looking to experts to weigh in on peptides

Peptide-based substances are largely unproven and risky, experts say, but they’re gaining popularity among influencers and athletes—and the U.S. secretary of health

RFK, Jr., at a podium.

Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., speaks at a news conference at the Department of Health and Human Services on April 22, 2025, in Washington, D.C.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is set to convene an expert panel in July to discuss whether some pharmacies can manufacture certain peptides, according to an agency filing submitted on Wednesday. The list includes unproven substances that have become increasingly popular among wellness influencers and athletes.

Peptides are short chains of amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, and they are found naturally in the body and produced synthetically. GLP-1 drugs—glucagonlike peptide 1 medications—are peptides.

In recent years, a gray market of lab-manufactured peptides has gained traction as DIY treatments for all sorts of ailments, from wrinkles to inflammation to low libido. Many of these have not been through thorough clinical trials, and people who take them often source them from compounding pharmacies, which make customized medications that aren’t individually assessed by the FDA for safety or effectiveness, or from providers abroad that may be entirely unregulated.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The FDA is under the jurisdiction of Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who is vocally supportive of peptides, has claimed to have used them himself and has pledged to end the FDA’s “war” on public health, including substances such as peptides.

“Today, we took long-overdue action to restore science, accountability, and the rule of law,” Kennedy said in a post on X on Wednesday that announced the July expert panel meetings. “This action begins to restore regulated access and will immediately begin shifting demand away from the black market.”

The FDA’s Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee will meet on July 23 and 24 to discuss whether licensed compounding pharmacies should be permitted to manufacture at least seven peptides, including BPC-157 for ulcerative colitis and inflammation and TB-500 for wound healing. The expert panel will not issue a binding decision but will offer recommendations to the FDA.

Other peptides on the agency’s list are KPV, which is also used for wound healing and inflammation, and MOTs-C, which is used to treat obesity and osteoporosis, as well as emideltide and epitalon for sleep problems and semax for cognitive issues.

Editor’s Note (4/15/26): This is a breaking news story and may be updated.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe