The Vine Disease

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This disease, which has ruined the crops of the vine-growing countries of Europe, is at last conquered. Mr. Kyle, a Scotch gardener, has discovered that the application of sulphur to the plant is an effectual preventive and remedy. Of such importance had this disease become to France, that the Society for the Encouragement of Agriculture offered a prize of $2,000 for a cure, and many smaller ones for researches on the subject. This first prize has been divided between Messrs. Kyle (who was also awarded the $100 gold medal of the Society), Duchartre, Gouties, and Maris. M. Barral, in his report to the Council, makes the following remark :—" It was England who inoculated the vine disease into Europe, but it is remarkable that it was in that country that it was most perfectly studied by Mr. Berkeley,-and again in the llame country that a cure was discovered by Mr. Eyle." In this country, and especially those parts of it where the vine is cultivated, it ought to be recollected that it should be studied as well as nurtured, and that, like every other plant, the more care and attention that is paid to its growth, the more abundant and luscious will be its fruits. It is not enough that our soil is so rich that it will grow luxuriantly without much oare. We yet ought to pay atten-' tion to it to produce still more luxuriance.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 19This article was published with the title “The Vine Disease” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 19 (), p. 150
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01161858-150a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe