New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Research Leader of the Year: The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, U.K.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

With genetic scientific advances reported almost daily, it sometimes seems as if we are merely waiting for researchers to discover the gene at fault for every human disease. The complex genetic basis of many common diseases, however, complicates prediction, diagnosis and treatment.

The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC), a constellation of more than 50 British research groups, took on the mammoth challenge of ferreting out the causes of diseases in which multiple genes are implicated. Last June they reported the findings of a study that scanned for specific gene variations among 17,000 British citizens: 2,000 each from patient groups diagnosed with bipolar disorder, coronary heart disease, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension and diabetes types 1 and 2, as well as 3,000 unafflicted who served as a control group. The large scale of the study was unprecedented and so was the payoff: 24 locations in the genome were found to be associated with six of the seven diseases.

The WTCCC compared the genomes of each affected group with those of the controls and zeroed in on locations where DNA bases differed between the two groups. The size of the study was essential in enabling the researchers to spot rare anomalies. Some of the signals were in coding regions of genes; some were in noncoding regions that might regulate other genes; and some were in “gene deserts”—noncoding regions with no identified function. The variants themselves may not actually be responsible for the diseases. But they serve as signposts for other researchers to investigate DNA at a fine scale.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Every person possesses a certain pattern of “polymorphisms” in the six billion nucleotides of their genomic DNA—three billion for each of the two sets of chromosomes. The statistical pattern of how these variations occur, provided by studies such as the one conducted by the WTCCC, will help physicians calculate the chances that a patient could develop symptoms of a hereditary disorder. The ultimate goal of this research is personalized medicine in which patients submit a blood sample and have their entire set of genes analyzed to determine predisposition to chronic diseases, the best food and exercise regimens to stay healthy, and which drugs and dosages will be most effective when illness does strike.

GENOME-WIDE SCANS turned up gene variants associated with disease, such as those for type 1 diabetes, shown as green highlights on a representation of chromosomes.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 1This article was published with the title “The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, U.K.” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 1 (), p. 42
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0108-42a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe