Research Leader of the Year: The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, U.K.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

With genetic scientific advances reported almost daily, it sometimes seems as if we are merely waiting for researchers to discover the gene at fault for every human disease. The complex genetic basis of many common diseases, however, complicates prediction, diagnosis and treatment.

The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC), a constellation of more than 50 British research groups, took on the mammoth challenge of ferreting out the causes of diseases in which multiple genes are implicated. Last June they reported the findings of a study that scanned for specific gene variations among 17,000 British citizens: 2,000 each from patient groups diagnosed with bipolar disorder, coronary heart disease, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension and diabetes types 1 and 2, as well as 3,000 unafflicted who served as a control group. The large scale of the study was unprecedented and so was the payoff: 24 locations in the genome were found to be associated with six of the seven diseases.

The WTCCC compared the genomes of each affected group with those of the controls and zeroed in on locations where DNA bases differed between the two groups. The size of the study was essential in enabling the researchers to spot rare anomalies. Some of the signals were in coding regions of genes; some were in noncoding regions that might regulate other genes; and some were in “gene deserts”—noncoding regions with no identified function. The variants themselves may not actually be responsible for the diseases. But they serve as signposts for other researchers to investigate DNA at a fine scale.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Every person possesses a certain pattern of “polymorphisms” in the six billion nucleotides of their genomic DNA—three billion for each of the two sets of chromosomes. The statistical pattern of how these variations occur, provided by studies such as the one conducted by the WTCCC, will help physicians calculate the chances that a patient could develop symptoms of a hereditary disorder. The ultimate goal of this research is personalized medicine in which patients submit a blood sample and have their entire set of genes analyzed to determine predisposition to chronic diseases, the best food and exercise regimens to stay healthy, and which drugs and dosages will be most effective when illness does strike.

GENOME-WIDE SCANS turned up gene variants associated with disease, such as those for type 1 diabetes, shown as green highlights on a representation of chromosomes.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 1This article was published with the title “The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, U.K.” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 1 (), p. 42
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0108-42a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe