The Wickedness of Waste.—Value of Bones

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If persons who carelessly and thoughtlessly throw away what they consider useless to themselves, understood the intrinsic value of these discarded trifles or this unpleasant rubbish, we are certain some little trouble would be taken to preserve and direct them to their real use. We will, from tlio thousand and one of theso unconsidcred trifles, select but one —bones—as a text for a few words in regard to their waste ; and we will not refer even to their use in the arts as. material for manufacture into various forms of us:; and beauty in which, they reappear on ourp?rsonsantl in our dwellings, but confine our remarks to the value of bones us a fertilizing- agent. Let us see, first, of what bones are composed. Take ox bones, which comprise the larger part of household bone waste. Berzelius gives the following as the constituents of the dry bones: Phosphate of lime with a little fluoride of calcium wjtt Bone gelatin............... ........... -t..,;: Carbonate of lime...........'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'............................ ' -, Fhosplmte of magnesia....... ........................... ' .(?- Soda and commonsalt.....................'..'.'.'.7.7.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.".'.'.' ??& 100-00 Every intelligent farmer knows that these are just the elements for combining with inorganic matter to make a fertile soil. It is, however, maintained by some that the nitrogen —contained in the gelatin—is not beneficial as a fertilizing element, from the fact that calcined bones deprived of their nitrogen, are still very valuable as a manure. But we believe that the nitrogenous element is really a valuable ingredient in fertilizers, for nitrate of soda, NaO, NOS is known to be a valuable fertilizer, and where found in natural beds as on the west coast of South America, it is exported for agricultural use as well as for the manufacture of nitric acid. The necessary amount of soda to form this combination exists in bones, and as the oxygen of the atmosphere readily combines with it, the objections against it as being unfit for fertilization do not seem to be tenable. Prof. Johnston (thaii whom no better authority can be quoted) says that one hundred pounds of dry bone-dust add to the soil as much organic animal matter as three hundred or four hundred pounds of blood or flesh, and also, at the same time, two-thirds of their weight of inorganic matter—lime, magnesia, common salt, soda, phosphoric acid—all of which should be present in a fertile soil. From this it will be seen that even if the usefulness of bones was limited to their application to the soil, their value is sufficient to induce care in their saving and preparation. The superphosphate of lime so favorably known to our farmers is simply bones treated with one-third their weight of sulphuric acid and an equal quantity of water. The farmers of England understand the value of bones. Beside those gathered in their own country, they import them from the pampas of South America, the feeding and slaughtering grounds of millions of semi-wild cattle, and prepare them for their soil.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 20 Issue 9This article was published with the title “The Wickedness of Waste.—Value of Bones” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 20 No. 9 (), p. 137
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican02271869-137c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe