The Zika Virus Has Changed Little over 70 Years—So Why Is It a Problem Now?

Scientists have sequenced the genomes of several Zika strains as they look for answers about the virus’s sudden appearance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Zika is more pernicious than public health officials anticipated. At present, it is circulating in more than 50 countries. And as of mid-May, seven countries or territories have reported cases of microcephaly or other serious birth defects linked to the virus, which is trans­mitted by mosquito bite, blood transfusion or sexual contact with an infected human. It can also be passed from mother to fetus during pregnancy.

Despite Zika’s vast range over almost 70 years, there is little genetic difference among the various strains, according to an analysis by re­­searchers at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. For example, the strain currently in the Americas and another previously detected in French Polynesia are practically indistinguishable from each other (group in white box). If the virus has changed so little over time, why is it rearing its ugly head now? Scientists are not sure yet, but new experimental work in mosquitoes suggests that the virus was capable of causing detrimental health effects and outbreaks all along. Therefore, it is unlikely mutations enabled new abilities. Instead public health officials probably did not understand Zika’s potential because the virus circulated mostly in remote locations until recently.

SOURCES: ZIKA VIRUS VECTORS AND RESERVOIRS, BY SCOTT C. WEAVER, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH, FEBRUARY 26, 2016 ; "ZIKA VIRUS OUTSIDE AFRICA," BY EDWARD B. HAYES, IN EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, VOL. 15, NO. 9; SEPTEMBER 2009; CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION. Graphic by Tiffany Farrant-Gonzalez

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe