New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Theories Realized

A 10-year effort pays off and finally reveals the shadowy face of a supermassive black hole

Event Horizon Telescope collaboration et al.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


About 1.3 billion years ago two black holes collided and sent undulating waves outward through spacetime like ripples on a pond. Here on Earth in the fall of 2015, a sensitive laser-based instrument recorded the waves and offered the first tangible evidence of black holes since Albert Einstein theorized their existence more than 100 years ago. And now, for the first time, scientists have taken a photograph of a black hole. As Lee Billings reports in “At Last,” at least nine radio telescopes across the globe linked together and snapped the image of the black hole at the center of the Messier 87 galaxy. Aligning with Einstein’s predictions, the center of the black hole is a dark shadow, surrounded by a vividly glowing ring of gas. As Carl Sagan once said, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And we can now say—more than ever—that we have the extraordinary evidence to conclude that black holes exist. Einstein, I surmise, would be pleased.

Elsewhere in the world of abstract theoretical physics, Anil Ananthaswamy reports that a group of mathematicians working on the “F-theory” branch of string theory has stumbled on a quadrillion—yes, three more zeros than a trillion—new potential solutions to string theory (see “Found: A Quadrillion Ways for String Theory to Make Our Universe”). And nearly 10 years on Christine-Maria Horejs and Giulia Pacchioni cover the many upgrades and future projects in the works at CERN (see “CERN’s Next Big Thing”). The quarry of physics research is vast, and we are now netting some admirable catch.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Space & Physics Vol 2 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Theories Realized” in SA Space & Physics Vol. 2 No. 3 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanspace0619-02

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe