New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Theory and Truth: Quantum Gravity versus 5 Unassailable Scientific Facts

In 1935 Albert Einstein and his collaborators wrote two papers about what seemed to be vastly different things. One, which he famously later described uncomfortably as “spooky action at a distance,” is quantum entanglement: a surprising connection between objects, such as atoms or subatomic particles, which may be quite far apart. The other is wormholes, shortcuts between distant regions of space and time predicted by relativity.

Work by theorists, including Juan Maldacena, author of this issue's cover story, “Black Holes, Wormholes and the Secrets of Quantum Spacetime,” suggests a surprising link between the two phenomena. As he writes, “quantum mechanics' entanglement and general relativity's wormholes may actually be equivalent”—with profound implications, including the tantalizing possibility of someday developing a unified theory of quantum mechanics and spacetime.

Not every area of science is in the realm of the theoretical, where we might debate the veracity of a particular field of inquiry and its possible ultimate outcomes. In many areas of perhaps more mundane human endeavor, we know what the truth looks like, thanks to uncounted numbers of experimentalists who have provided evidence-based documentation in thousands of studies conducted over decades or longer. Still, some will deny the data.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In an election year, with so many candidates rejecting even basic truths, it seems especially appropriate to fulfill a promise that Scientific American made to readers in its first issue, in 1845: “In conducting this publication we shall endeavor to avoid all expressions of sentiment, on any sectional, sectarian, or political party subject; but we shall exercise a full share of independence, in the occasional exposure of ignorance and knavery.”

With this in mind, we offer “5 Things We Know to Be True.” In a series of essays, our expert authors describe areas where research is definitive: that the process of evolution explains life as we know it today, that human-caused climate change is real, that vaccines do not cause autism, that homeopathy is bunk and that aliens have not, in fact, visited our blue planet. The package calls out numerous other fallacies, some entertaining and some distressing.

As Einstein himself wrote in his Scientific American article, “On the Generalized Theory of Gravitation,” in April 1950, “experience alone can decide on truth.” Here's hoping that more people can come to embrace that experience along with an evidence-based view of the world.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Theory and Truth” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 5 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1116-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe