Theory and Truth: Quantum Gravity versus 5 Unassailable Scientific Facts

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In 1935 Albert Einstein and his collaborators wrote two papers about what seemed to be vastly different things. One, which he famously later described uncomfortably as “spooky action at a distance,” is quantum entanglement: a surprising connection between objects, such as atoms or subatomic particles, which may be quite far apart. The other is wormholes, shortcuts between distant regions of space and time predicted by relativity.

Work by theorists, including Juan Maldacena, author of this issue's cover story, “Black Holes, Wormholes and the Secrets of Quantum Spacetime,” suggests a surprising link between the two phenomena. As he writes, “quantum mechanics' entanglement and general relativity's wormholes may actually be equivalent”—with profound implications, including the tantalizing possibility of someday developing a unified theory of quantum mechanics and spacetime.

Not every area of science is in the realm of the theoretical, where we might debate the veracity of a particular field of inquiry and its possible ultimate outcomes. In many areas of perhaps more mundane human endeavor, we know what the truth looks like, thanks to uncounted numbers of experimentalists who have provided evidence-based documentation in thousands of studies conducted over decades or longer. Still, some will deny the data.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In an election year, with so many candidates rejecting even basic truths, it seems especially appropriate to fulfill a promise that Scientific American made to readers in its first issue, in 1845: “In conducting this publication we shall endeavor to avoid all expressions of sentiment, on any sectional, sectarian, or political party subject; but we shall exercise a full share of independence, in the occasional exposure of ignorance and knavery.”

With this in mind, we offer “5 Things We Know to Be True.” In a series of essays, our expert authors describe areas where research is definitive: that the process of evolution explains life as we know it today, that human-caused climate change is real, that vaccines do not cause autism, that homeopathy is bunk and that aliens have not, in fact, visited our blue planet. The package calls out numerous other fallacies, some entertaining and some distressing.

As Einstein himself wrote in his Scientific American article, “On the Generalized Theory of Gravitation,” in April 1950, “experience alone can decide on truth.” Here's hoping that more people can come to embrace that experience along with an evidence-based view of the world.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 315 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Theory and Truth” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 315 No. 5 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1116-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe