Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes Charged with Fraud

The SEC complaint alleges that the company misled investors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday charged Theranos and CEO Elizabeth Holmes with fraud, capping off a remarkable downfall for a once high-flying company that promised to revolutionize the blood testing industry but instead became a parable for Silicon Valley hype and hubris.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that the privately held company deceived investors by exaggerating or speaking falsely about what its technology could do. While the company told investors it could provide quick, accurate medical test results from just a few drops of blood pricked from a finger, it was in fact running most of its tests on machines manufactured by other companies. Theranos also falsely told investors that its products were used by the Department of Defense and that the company would bring in a thousand times more revenue in 2014 than it actually did, the SEC alleged. These and other deceptions were first reported in a series of investigative stories by the Wall Street Journal’s John Carreyrou.

Both Holmes and her company have agreed to settle the cases, neither admitting nor denying the SEC’s allegations. Holmes, the charismatic young Stanford dropout who once adorned the cover of magazines in Steve Jobs-esque turtlenecks, must pay a $500,000 penalty, give up voting control of the company, return the shares she obtained during the alleged fraud, and cannot be part of the leadership of a public company for a decade.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The SEC separately charged the company’s former president and No. 2 executive, Sunny Balwani, in a case that will be litigated in federal court in California.

In 2014, the Silicon Valley upstart reached a valuation of $9 billion, the most of any venture-backed company working in health care. But in June 2016, Forbes estimated that its value had fallen to close to zero. The company announced later that summer that it was pivoting to developing a “MiniLab” to carry out a variety of tests in different locations.

Theranos released a statement on Wednesday quoting its independent directors as saying that the company “is pleased to be bringing this matter to a close and looks forward to advancing its technology.”

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on March 14, 2018

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe