New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes Charged with Fraud

The SEC complaint alleges that the company misled investors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday charged Theranos and CEO Elizabeth Holmes with fraud, capping off a remarkable downfall for a once high-flying company that promised to revolutionize the blood testing industry but instead became a parable for Silicon Valley hype and hubris.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that the privately held company deceived investors by exaggerating or speaking falsely about what its technology could do. While the company told investors it could provide quick, accurate medical test results from just a few drops of blood pricked from a finger, it was in fact running most of its tests on machines manufactured by other companies. Theranos also falsely told investors that its products were used by the Department of Defense and that the company would bring in a thousand times more revenue in 2014 than it actually did, the SEC alleged. These and other deceptions were first reported in a series of investigative stories by the Wall Street Journal’s John Carreyrou.

Both Holmes and her company have agreed to settle the cases, neither admitting nor denying the SEC’s allegations. Holmes, the charismatic young Stanford dropout who once adorned the cover of magazines in Steve Jobs-esque turtlenecks, must pay a $500,000 penalty, give up voting control of the company, return the shares she obtained during the alleged fraud, and cannot be part of the leadership of a public company for a decade.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The SEC separately charged the company’s former president and No. 2 executive, Sunny Balwani, in a case that will be litigated in federal court in California.

In 2014, the Silicon Valley upstart reached a valuation of $9 billion, the most of any venture-backed company working in health care. But in June 2016, Forbes estimated that its value had fallen to close to zero. The company announced later that summer that it was pivoting to developing a “MiniLab” to carry out a variety of tests in different locations.

Theranos released a statement on Wednesday quoting its independent directors as saying that the company “is pleased to be bringing this matter to a close and looks forward to advancing its technology.”

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on March 14, 2018

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe