Thermometer Reads Temperature from Noise

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists have designed a new kind of thermometer that uses noise to measure temperature. According to a report published in the current issue of the journal Science, the device gives highly accurate readings between room temperature and one kelvin.

Lafe Spietz of Yale University and his colleagues manufactured the thermometer out of two layers of aluminum separated by a section of aluminum oxide. A voltage applied across the apparatus causes electrons to tunnel through the barrier, creating an electrical current. The relationship between the magnitude of the voltage and the amount of noise, or variation, within the current is temperature-dependent. As a result, the so-called shot noise thermometer (SNT) tells temperature as long as the applied voltage is known. The researchers determined that the SNT is accurate to within one part in 1,000 at one kelvin, which is five times as good as thermometers currently used for temperatures near absolute zero.

The new design's greatest strength is that it is a primary thermometer: it does not require outside calibration. That's because the relationship between voltage, noise and temperature relies only on fundamental physics constants. In addition, the device provides accurate measurements over a much larger range of temperatures than other thermometers do. The authors thus propose that their SNT "may have a much broader field of application than present primary thermometers."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe