New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

These birds learned to tweet like R2-D2. Listen to the uncanny results

This lovable Star Wars droid is helping to shed light on why some bird species are better at mimicking sounds than others

R2D2 bird conceptual illustration

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, R2-D2 beeped and booped—and now birds that copy the Star Wars character are giving scientists fresh insight into how different species imitate complex sounds. A recent study in Scientific Reports analyzed the vocalizations of European Starlings and nine species of parrots, including budgies, to see how accurately each bird can mimic R2-D2’s robotic whirring.

Researchers analyzed recordings they found online of birds imitating the plucky droid to find out how statistically similar each bird’s noises were to a model of R2-D2’s sounds. The starlings, a type of songbird, emerged as star vocalists: their ability to produce “multiphonic” noises—in this case, two different notes or tones expressed simultaneously—allowed them to replicate R2-D2’s complex chirps the most accurately. Budgies and other parrots, which produce only “monophonic” (single-tone) noises, copied the droid’s sounds with less accuracy and musicality.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The differing abilities stem from physical variations in the birds’ syrinx, a vocal organ that sits at the base of the avian windpipe. “Starlings can produce two sounds at once because they control both sides of the syrinx independently,” says study co-author Nick Dam, an evolutionary biologist at Leiden University in the Netherlands. “Parrots are physically incapable of producing two tones simultaneously.”

It isn’t known exactly why species developed differing control over their syrinx. “Most likely some ancestor of songbirds happened to evolve the ability to control the muscles on both sides of the syrinx, and this helped them in some way,” says University of Northern Colorado biologist Lauryn Benedict, who wasn’t involved in the study. A leading explanation involves mating: the better a male songbird sings, the more females he attracts.

A diptych with R2-D2 on the left and a starling perched on a branch on the right

Some birds such as starlings (right) are better at mimicking R2-D2 (left) than others.

Jay L. Clendenin/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images (left); Gary Chalker/Getty Images (right)

Although the study is “a really elegant way of approaching this question of whether the starlings versus the parrots are capable of producing the same sound with the same accuracy,” it doesn’t fully address how much training or reward the birds received, says Nicole Creanza, an evolutionary biologist at Vanderbilt University, who also wasn’t involved with the research.

Benedict agrees that the researchers could work with bird owners to do tightly controlled trials. (And she and other scientists, including some of the study authors, are looking for public submissions of other examples of parrots imitating sounds for their Many Parrots Project.) “A wider sample would be really neat,” she says, “and they could test all kinds of different sounds, not just R2-D2!”

Kate Graham-Shaw is a journalist based in New York City. She covers international news for Japanese media and also covers health and science topics as a freelancer.

More by Kate Graham-Shaw
Scientific American Magazine Vol 334 Issue 2This article was published with the title “R2-D2 Tweets” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 334 No. 2 (), p. 8
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022026-1zQ0h261RDWN0AD2nzZTKF

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe