New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

These fish can tell when you’re staring

Fish may possess the ability to perceive where another being’s attention is focused. And they don’t like when it’s focused on them or on their children

Two yellow and brown striped fish looking at the camera with light blue water and brown lakebed behind them

Male (left) and female (right) emperor cichilds behaving aggressively toward a diver by flaring their gill covers.

From “Watching the Watchers: Emperor Cichlids Can Perceive Attention towards Their Offspring by Divers,” by Shun Satoh et al., in Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 13, No. 3; March 18, 2026 (CC BY 4.0)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Do you know that uncomfortable feeling of being watched? A new study shows that fish also seem to know when they—or their kids—are being stared at, and that they don’t like it. The work, published Tuesday in Royal Society Open Science, gives rare insight into the minds of fish.

Previous research has suggested that some primates, domestic animals and birds seem to possess what is called attention attribution—the ability to perceive where another individual is focused. “It means distinguishing not just who is present but what that individual is paying attention to,” says study author Shun Satoh, a fish biologist at Kyoto University in Japan.

To see whether fish might possess this ability, the team went to Lake Tanganyika in eastern Africa to conduct different experiments on the emperor cichlid (Boulengerochromis microlepis), a species that is neither too fearful of nor too aggressive toward humans. Using waterproof cameras, the team recorded how adult fish guarding their offspring behaved when a diver looked at a fish’s eggs or its recently hatched youngsters, looked in another direction, or looked at the fish itself. The researchers also observed what happened when the diver turned 180 degrees from the nest.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An analysis of the recordings showed that the parents behaved aggressively toward the divers more often when the human interlopers were staring at the offspring or the parent, compared with when the diver was looking in another direction or completely turned away.

Though the authors acknowledge the study is preliminary, the results suggest that “the fish do not respond only to a diver’s presence but also to cues related to where the diver’s attention is directed,” Satoh says.

The study is a great starting point to answering whether fish possess attention attribution, says Gabrielle Davidson, a behavioral ecologist at the University of East Anglia in England, who was not involved in the work. “Animals are so sensitive to eyelike stimuli that we would expect them to find the gaze threatening or scary if it was directed at them,” she says. The study seems to go a step further, however, by showing that the fish might be able to track where the diver is looking at. “It’s not just a reflexive response to eyes being straight at them.”

Davidson thinks this ability could be widespread in other fish species, but she adds that more research is needed to figure out if the fish are actually looking at the diver’s gaze or if they are responding to other cues.

“One of the biggest challenges is to know what’s inside the mind of other animals,” she says. “These types of extra conditions and experiments can take us a step forward to revealing the inner understanding of these animals.”

Gennaro Tomma is a freelance journalist who covers science, with a focus on the natural world, biodiversity, conservation, climate change, environmental and science-related policies, and more. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Science, National Geographic, New Scientist and other outlets. Find more on his website: https://gennarotomma.it

More by Gennaro Tomma

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe