New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Think Ensemble

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The brain does not function linearly, as most computers do. Instead groups of neurons compete to represent a concept, until one emerges dominant. The mind consists of an ensemble of such states, continuously evolving and sharing information. Michael Spivey, a psychologist at Cornell University, recently presented one more piece of evidence for this conclusion.

The researcher asked 42 volunteers to move a cursor toward one of two images at the top of a computer screen after hearing a recorded voice speak the name of one of them. When the two objects had phonetically similar names, such as “candle” and “candy,” the volunteers took longer to click on the correct object than when the names were distinct (“candle” and “jacket”). Furthermore, the cursor trajectories were more curved when the words sounded similar. The curvature represents the time during which the two interpretations are competing, before one finally wins out, which Spivey says, “argues against the traditional modular framework”—the model in which the mind works like a computer.

SA Mind Vol 16 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Think Ensemble” in SA Mind Vol. 16 No. 3 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1005-10c

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe