Think Ensemble

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The brain does not function linearly, as most computers do. Instead groups of neurons compete to represent a concept, until one emerges dominant. The mind consists of an ensemble of such states, continuously evolving and sharing information. Michael Spivey, a psychologist at Cornell University, recently presented one more piece of evidence for this conclusion.

The researcher asked 42 volunteers to move a cursor toward one of two images at the top of a computer screen after hearing a recorded voice speak the name of one of them. When the two objects had phonetically similar names, such as “candle” and “candy,” the volunteers took longer to click on the correct object than when the names were distinct (“candle” and “jacket”). Furthermore, the cursor trajectories were more curved when the words sounded similar. The curvature represents the time during which the two interpretations are competing, before one finally wins out, which Spivey says, “argues against the traditional modular framework”—the model in which the mind works like a computer.

SA Mind Vol 16 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Think Ensemble” in SA Mind Vol. 16 No. 3 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1005-10c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe