New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

This Insect-Sized Robot Can Carry 22 Times Its Own Weight

The four-legged miniature machine is powered by tiny explosions

Four legged miniature machine hovering above 2 stones in green landscape

This insect-sized robot can carry 22 times its own weight.

Cameron Aubin

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

An insect-sized robot powered by tiny explosions can crawl, leap and carry a load many times its own weight.

The robot, developed by materials engineer Robert Shepherd at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, his PhD student Cameron Aubin and their colleagues, is powered by tiny actuators. “The actuator kind of looks like a drum. It’s a hollow cylinder with an elastomeric silicone rubber on the top,” says Aubin.

The researchers used four actuators to drive the robot’s feet. To make the robot jump or crawl, a stream of methane and oxygen is fed into each foot and sparked with electricity from a battery. The resulting reaction between the gases to form water and carbon dioxide releases energy as a small explosion, causing the rubber layer to deform. “That acts sort of like a piston,” Aubin says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The tiny explosions happen so quickly, Shepherd says, that there are no flames to burn or damage the rubber. But they provide considerable propulsion: the robot could jump to a height of 56 centimetres and carry a load 22 times its own weight.

“This team has brought chemically powered actuation to impressive length scales for robotics while also demonstrating impressive capabilities for insect-scale machines,” says Ryan Truby, a materials scientist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois.

Robots that are small and light but strong and able to cover large distances could one day be utilized in environmental monitoring or search-and-rescue applications. The robot Aubin and Shepherd built, described in a paper published on 14 September in Science, will need further development for use in the field. At the moment, it must be tethered to a panel that contains the gas supply and a battery, a restriction that presents a challenge, says Truby. “Devising ways of combusting fuels on board an untethered robot is not trivial,” he says. “This is the next big hurdle to address.”

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on September 14, 2023.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe