New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

This is the most complete skeleton yet of our ancestor Homo habilis

A partial skeleton dating back more than two million years is the most complete yet of Homo habilis, one of the earliest known species in our genus

A collection of bones laid out on a black background

The bones of the Homo habilis skeleton found in found in the Lake Turkana Basin of Kenya.

Adapted from "New partial skeleton of Homo habilis from the upper Burgi Member, Koobi Fora Formation, Ileret, Kenya," by Grine, et al., in The Anatomical Record; January 13, 2026

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A skeleton found in the Lake Turkana Basin area of northern Kenya is the most complete set of remains ever found of Homo habilis, a species that was one of the earliest members of the Homo genus and lived more than two million years ago. Its large brain and flat face—attributes found in today’s humans—have long set the species apart from earlier hominins such as Australopithecus africanus. A new study analyzing the uniquely complete skeleton, however, suggests H. habilis’ body looked much less modern.

The analysis of the bones, published on January 13 in the Anatomical Record, affirms previous assumptions about the species, such as that H. habilis had long and strong arms that were more similar in proportion to those of apes than to those of modern humans. Additionally, H. habilis was small—perhaps even smaller than Lucy, a 3.2-million-year-old hominin specimen known for her tiny size.

“A finding like this does give hope,” says William Harcourt-Smith, a paleoanthropologist at the American Museum of Natural History, who was not involved in the study. “It’s been tough with Homo habilis, as there are very limited, scrappy remains. It shows us that hard work in the field, and constantly looking for them, reaps important dividends.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Some of the skeleton’s teeth were first found in the sediments of Lake Turkana by Arbollo Aike of the Koobi Fora Research Project in 2012. Over the next couple of years, the study authors followed a trail of bone fragments downslope for several meters, discovering more teeth and a series of larger bones from the upper body. The fully excavated skeleton includes a nearly complete set of lower teeth, both collarbones, both upper arm and forearm bones, and fragments of the shoulder blades and pelvis.

Analyzing the bones took more than a decade, study co-author Ashley Hammond said in a statement. First researchers had to ascertain that all the bones came from the same individual and that the individual was from the H. habilis species. “Fortunately for us, the teeth are one of the most diagnostic parts of the skeleton for identifying hominin species,” says study co-author Carrie Mongle, an assistant professor of anthropology at Stony Brook University.

Still elusive is the build of H. habilis’ lower body. The pelvic fragment found with the new skeleton suggests the species might have been able to walk more upright than earlier hominins, Mongle says. Still, more information about the lower body is needed to learn exactly where the species fits into the evolution of humanlike posture and gait.

Because H. habilis is one of the earliest members of our genus, understanding more about this species helps to shed light on the evolution that led to our own, researchers say.

“This study underlines how crucial individual fossil discoveries can be,” says Rebecca Wragg Sykes, an honorary archeology researcher at the University of Cambridge and the University of Liverpool in England, who was not involved in the study. “Just a few new fragments can transform our view not only of that species but [of] their evolutionary context, too.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe