New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

This Year in Science

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Of all the scientific accomplishments in 2019, one in particular stands out: an image of a flaming ring of starlight surrounding a dark circle. Black holes had long been theorized to exist but never directly observed, and scientists had until this year only guessed at what they might look like. But finally, it happened. After more than 10 years of data collection from 11 radio telescopes around the world, astronomers captured the shadow of the gargantuan black hole at the heart of the galaxy Messier 87 (above).

Few things inspire as much awe as seeing what was once unseeable, but there were a number of other extraterrestrial milestones in the past 12 months. On January 1, NASA’s New Horizons probe flew by the farthest body ever visited by a spacecraft—the snowman-shaped object called Ultima Thule. Local temperature was reportedly 400 degrees Fahrenheit below zero. Then, in July, we celebrated the 50-year anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing. Precious lunar territory may soon be hotly contested by spacefaring nations and commercial interests in search of new resources, Adam Mann writes.

Back on Earth, incredible achievements abound. Neuroscientists restored circulation and molecular and cellular functions in excised pig brains four hours after death, making them appear relatively normal but for the absence of brain waves indicative of consciousness. Elsewhere in the resurrection department, researchers re-created the scent genes and inhaled the fragrance of plants that have been extinct for decades. As for the origins of life, analyses of ancient coral-like fossils suggest that complex animals got their start millions of years earlier than previously thought.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Every year it seems that science becomes more central to tackling society’s problems. With engineers trying to head off dangerous global warming, Richard Conniff takes stock of the technologies available to remove carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere. A team of investigators working in Guinea-Bissau devised and tested a controversial but enticing hypothesis that some vaccines for specific diseases can confer protection for many other maladies, such as tuberculosis, malaria or flu. Cailin O’Connor and James Owen Weatherall apply network science to explain why misinformation goes viral so easily.

The elegance of science is its ability to be agile and adaptive—it asks how we know what we know, posing questions that are continually refined and reframed. And sometimes we’re lucky enough to get signposts that show—through a shadowy ring of fire perhaps—we’re on the right path.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Special Editions Vol 28 Issue 5This article was published with the title “This Year in Science” in SA Special Editions Vol. 28 No. 5 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericantopstories1219-1

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe