New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Thorny Fence

The invention of barbed wire was a huge commercial success--and the subject of furious legal battles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


AT SOME POINT IN THE HISTORY of civilization, shepherding gave way to farming. That created a need for some way of keeping cows and pigs from wandering freely through the meadows. The fence was born. Wooden fences were among the earliest, but they are expensive and time-consuming to build. By 1870 smooth cable was easy to get hold of and came into wide use on ranches. Cattle would rub their back on the wire, and sometimes one would slip through. Eventually the herds caught on.

That got Michael Kelly, an inventor from New York City, wondering how he might make the wire less comfortable as a bovine back scratcher. He got the idea to twist bits of sharp pointed wire onto ordinary cable, and in 1868 he patented his “thorny fence.” It was a big success—and a magnet for lawsuits. “Almost overnight it developed into a source of wealth and furious litigation colored by impassioned charges and countercharges of patent infringement and greed,” says historian Robert T. Clifton.

Joseph Glidden of DeKalb, Ill., also hit legal snags over an improved wire that used two strands to lock the barbs in place. In 1892 his case went before the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled in his favor, making him the undisputed father of an invention that more than any other marked the closing of the West's open range.

Mike May is a freelance writer and editor based in Bradenton, Fla.

More by Mike May
Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Thorny Fence” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 2 (), p. 50
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0810-50a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe