Thorny Fence

The invention of barbed wire was a huge commercial success--and the subject of furious legal battles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


AT SOME POINT IN THE HISTORY of civilization, shepherding gave way to farming. That created a need for some way of keeping cows and pigs from wandering freely through the meadows. The fence was born. Wooden fences were among the earliest, but they are expensive and time-consuming to build. By 1870 smooth cable was easy to get hold of and came into wide use on ranches. Cattle would rub their back on the wire, and sometimes one would slip through. Eventually the herds caught on.

That got Michael Kelly, an inventor from New York City, wondering how he might make the wire less comfortable as a bovine back scratcher. He got the idea to twist bits of sharp pointed wire onto ordinary cable, and in 1868 he patented his “thorny fence.” It was a big success—and a magnet for lawsuits. “Almost overnight it developed into a source of wealth and furious litigation colored by impassioned charges and countercharges of patent infringement and greed,” says historian Robert T. Clifton.

Joseph Glidden of DeKalb, Ill., also hit legal snags over an improved wire that used two strands to lock the barbs in place. In 1892 his case went before the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled in his favor, making him the undisputed father of an invention that more than any other marked the closing of the West's open range.

Mike May is a freelance writer and editor based in Bradenton, Fla.

More by Mike May
Scientific American Magazine Vol 303 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Thorny Fence” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 303 No. 2 (), p. 50
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0810-50a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe