Three New Planets

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image: Anglo-Australian Obervatory

Using a new high-precision system on the four-meter Anglo-Australian Telescope (AAT), an international team of scientists has identified three more planets orbiting stars within 150 light-years from Earth. They are the first planets discovered by this Southern-based search, which complements the Northern surveys run by Geoffrey Marcy, Paul Butler and Michael Mayor. Although three planets isn't much compared to the 46 that have been found in the North over the past 5 years, Chris Tinney, team leader at the AAT, says many more candidates are probably in the pipeline. "In three years you can catch only the short-period planets," he explains. "To pick up ones with longer obits you hav to observe for a few more years."

The new objects do indeed have relatively short years. The tiniest, which is slightly smaller than Jupiter, whizzes around its star in a neck-breaking three Earth days. The middle-sized planet, weighing in at 1.26 Jupiter masses or more, circles the star epsilon Reticulum in Net within 426 days. (Despite its Earth-like years, the new planet is probably a gas giant like Jupiter.) And the biggest of the trio--another gas giant that is at least 1.86 Jupiter masses--takes 743 days to cruise around its star, mu Ara in the constellation of Ara. Like planets found in the Northern searches, these three made themselves known by the effect they have on their parent star: The mass of the planet tugs on the star, making it wobble and shifting its light in a telltale way.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe