Tin Foils Melting Ideas

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: Martin Jarrold/Northwestern University

When it comes to melting, metals have always acted like chocolates: the smaller the piece, the less heat it takes. The reason is that smaller clusters have more atoms exposed on their surface, and so less heat is needed to break those bonds than if the atoms are embedded in a crystal. But physical chemists have now found an exception to that rule. In nanoscale clusters of tin--those having between 15 and 30 atoms--the melting point actually rises to at least 50 degrees Kelvin higher than in bulk tin. Their results appear in this week's issue of Physical Review Letters.

Martin Jarrold and graduate student Alexandre Shvartsburg of Northwestern University needed to develop a special technique to measure these melting points. "You can't stick a thermometer in these things," Jarrold explains. They first blasted a tin rod with a laser pulse to evaporate ionized atoms, which cooled into nanoscale clusters; a mass spectrometer counted the atoms in each. Next came an ion mobility measurement, conducted by timing the clusters as they traveled through an electric field in a temperature-controlled drift chamber filled with helium. This test indicates a cluster's shape: cigar-shaped clusters hit more helium atoms and take more time through the chamber than do spherical ones of the same mass.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At melting point, the researchers expected the normally cigar-shaped clusters to become spherical--but they never got there. Jarrold and Shvartsburg raised the temperature to their heater's maximum, 550 K, to no effect. For now, they cannot explain the behavior but suggest that it has to do with the unsual, elongated shapes adopted by small clusters of tin, silicon and germanium. (above)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe