Tiny Crystals Tell Story of Earth's Earliest-Known Meteor Impact

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A number of near-Earth asteroids have made headlines lately, but, thankfully, none is likely to hit us anytime soon. That wasn't the case in our planet's early years. Scientists surmise that between three and four billion years ago the central solar system was battered by a cataclysmic event that sent objects careening into the inner planets in their formative years. The moon, Mars and Venus bear scars from these impacts in the form of crater basins, but no such signs are evident on Earth. Now researchers writing in the current issue of the journal Science say they have the first direct evidence--in the form of layers of ancient rock from Australia and South Africa--that our planet experienced a meteorite impact 3.5 billion years ago. According to the report, the offending body was roughly twice the size of the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs 65 million years ago and created a tsunami that raced around the globe at 500 miles per hour.

To determine the date of the impact, Gary R. Byerly of Louisiana State University and his colleagues studied tiny grains called spherules within the recovered rocks. A meteorite impact leaves its mark with these droplets, which result from the condensation of the vaporized asteroid, and with a trail of metals that are rare on Earth. By measuring the radioactive decay of uranium and lead within mineral grains known as zircons--which are created by Earth processes such as volcanoes and are extremely resistant to change--the team dated the impact to 3.47 billion years ago, plus or minus two million years.

Despite the catastrophic nature of the collision, no impact crater remains, and the scientists don't know where the crash took place. It most likely occurred in water, they say, because most of the planet was submerged at the time and the resulting destruction would help to erase signs of the crash. "It would take only a second or two for a meteor that's 20 kilometers in diameter to pass through the ocean and impact the rock beneath," study co-author Donald R. Lowe of Stanford University says. "That would generate enormous waves kilometers high that would spread out from the impact site, sweep across the ocean and produce just incredible tsunamis--causing a tremendous amount of erosions on the microcontinents and tearing up the bottom of the ocean."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe