New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Tiny Footprints May Have Been Made by World’s Smallest Nonavian Dinosaur

The raptorlike prints could also have been from juveniles of a larger species

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A series of one-centimeter-long, 110-million-year-old footprints found in South Korea were left by what may be the tiniest nonbird dinosaur ever discovered. “These were made by several incredibly small raptor dinosaurs,” says Anthony Romilio, a co-author of a study detailing the discovery and a postdoctoral researcher in paleontology at the University of Queensland in Australia. “Prior to our find, there would have been few who would have imagined that some raptors were so small that two or three could have easily fitted in your cupped hand.”

Each footprint resembles the number 11, suggesting that these creatures walked on two toes per foot. The only dinosaurs known to match this style of prints are dromaeosaurs—a family of speedy predators that included Velociraptor mongoliensis, of Jurassic Park fame. These raptors had four toes on each foot; one was diminutive like a cat's dewclaw, and another had a sickle-shaped claw and was held above the ground while a raptor walked. The sparrow-sized dromaeosaurs that left these footprints would have had hips that were only four to five centimeters high. Their tracks, found in the South Korean city of Jinju, were described last November in Scientific Reports by a team led by Kyung Soo Kim of the country's Chinju National University of Education.

The prints look like they were left by an adult dinosaur smaller than any known type other than birds, Romilio says. Still, the possibility remains that a clutch of dinosaur chicks could have made them; similar footprints 10 times bigger—possibly from an adult—have been found at a site 30 kilometers away. Skeletal fossil evidence from the region is needed to pin down which hypothesis is correct, Romilio notes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Most people expect dinosaur tracks to be huge, bathtublike depressions, and some dinosaurs did leave some pretty big holes in the ground,” says Anthony Martin, a paleontologist at Emory University who studies trace fossils (such as footprints and burrows) and was not involved in the study. But the new finding “shows us that we also sometimes need to think small.” Even if the footprints were left by hatchlings, he adds, they hint that these juvenile dinosaurs were precocious and able to leave their nest soon after hatching, similar to some modern birds.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe