New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Tiny Fossils Could Be First Complex Animals

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Around 540 million years ago, life on the earth underwent a profound growth spurt: during the Cambrian explosion, the planet¿s multicellular life diversified rapidly. Scientists writing in the journal Science say that they have identified in rocks from China what may be the beginnings of this revolution. According to the report, the fossils are the earliest evidence of animals with a two-sided body plan (as opposed to a radial one) and date to around 55 million years before the Cambrian explosion.

Jun-Yuan Chen of the Nanjing Institute of Geology and Paleontology and an international team of researchers identified 10 fossils in the Doushantuo Formation in southwest China, which is between 580 and 600 million years old. The remains, which the researchers christened Vernanimalcula guizhouena, or "small spring animal," measure just 200 micrometers across and are oval in shape (see image). The team identified a number of organs inside the specimens, including mouths, guts, possible sense organs and body cavities called coeloms.

The new finds indicate that the "genetic toolkit" required for two-sided development evolved long before the Cambrian, the authors argue. Vernanimalcula guizhouena implies that very early life-forms did not have to be large to be complex.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe