Tiny Robots Could Clean Up Microplastic Pollution

In a proof-of-concept study, microscopic self-propelled devices found and broke down microplastic particles

Microrobot.

Microrobot. 

“A Maze in Plastic Wastes: Autonomous Motile Photocatalytic Microrobots against Microplastics,” by Seyyed Mohsen Beladi-Mousavi et al., in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Vol. 13, No. 21; June 2, 2021 (microrobot)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Microplastics—minuscule, hard-to-degrade fragments of clothing fibers, water bottles and other synthetic items—have made their way into air, water and soil around the world.

Now new research published in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces shows a way to promote their deterioration, at least in water, with technology on an even smaller scale: microrobots. When added to water along with a bit of hydrogen peroxide, the bacterium-sized devices glom onto microplastic particles and begin breaking them down.

The metallic microrobots are shaped like four-pointed stars and coated with magnetic particles. Exposure to visible light causes electrons in the devices to absorb energy from and react with the surrounding water and hydrogen peroxide (a process called photocatalysis), making the bots move. “They can sweep a much larger area than you would be able to touch with stationary technology,” says study co-author Martin Pumera, a researcher at the University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague. As the microrobots adhere to plastic, photocatalysis also produces charged molecules. These break chemical bonds in the plastic's molecules, like a jeweler snipping bracelet links.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers tested the microrobots on four types of plastic. After a week, all four had begun degrading, losing between 0.5 and 3 percent of their weight. In another test, the microrobots propelled themselves through a small channel and were collected by a magnet, bringing up to 70 percent of microplastic particles along for the ride.

Pumera envisions releasing future iterations of the bots into the sea to latch onto microplastics, then collecting the bots for reuse. But Win Cowger, who studies plastic pollution at the University of California, Riverside, and was not involved in the study, says any microrobots' potential usefulness is likely limited to closed systems such as those used to treat drinking water or wastewater.

Cowger notes that the current bots can also adhere to substances other than plastic and might not be safe if left in the water in large numbers. Pumera's team is now testing microrobots made from different materials that could address both concerns and could operate without hydrogen peroxide.

“The work is indeed highly interesting, but it needs further investigation to make this approach a really viable and potentially attractive technology to deal with the huge scale of microplastics,” University of Oxford chemists Peter Edwards and Sergio Gonzalez-Cortes wrote in an e-mail. The two researchers, who were not involved in the study, have proposed using microwave radiation to break down plastic waste.

For now, Cowger says, “the best way to remove microplastics from the environment is to stop them from getting there in the first place.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe