New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Tiny Vibrating Bubbles Could Make Mining More Sustainable

An updated bubbling process allows for more efficient mineral separation

Mining blast at an open pit copper mine in Chile

Copper mine in Chile.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Pulling essential minerals from the ground is dirty work, and most of the stuff miners extract is useless sediment. In some Chilean copper mines, for instance, hundreds of thousands of tons of material are processed every day, “but 95 percent of that is waste,” says D. R. Nagaraj, a mining industry expert at Columbia University. To sift out precious minerals, engineers often blow air bubbles through the material in a setup called a bubbling fluidized bed—and a new twist could make this costly process more efficient.

In the current system, sediment is pushed up through a chamber by air bubbles, separating particles of different sizes so dirt can be skimmed off the top. But the procedure uses a lot of water and energy, partially because the air bubbles’ chaotic motion reduces their efficiency, says Columbia University chemical engineer Chris Boyce. “They’re coalescing and splitting and not maintaining a uniform size,” he explains, making the sorting process uneven.

In the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Boyce and his colleagues describe a way of keeping the bubbles in line, requiring less energy to separate minerals from refuse. They mounted the bubble-filled chamber on a platform vibrating at a consistent clip and found that otherwise chaotic air pockets lined up into ascending rows as the system shook. The vibrations make dirt particles shift between solid and fluidlike states, sometimes behaving like sand in a sandcastle, sometimes acting like grains in an hourglass, Boyce says. The researchers documented how this rapid shifting pushes the bubbles into formation—a process that previous models of gas-solid interactions could not predict, the team writes.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The experimental results held for varying apparatus and particle sizes. This bodes well for the shift in magnitude from laboratory to industry, Boyce says.

That’s “the key question,” says McGill University materials engineer Kristian Waters, who was not involved in the study. “How can we scale up this process? Some mines are working at hundreds of thousands of tons a day in ore.”

Boyce is now collaborating with experts such as Nagaraj to put the findings to work reducing mining’s environmental footprint. Even green technologies such as electric cars need minerals, Nagaraj says, so “if mining is not sustainable, nothing else will be.”

Tess Joosse was formerly an Editorial Fellow at Scientific American. She earned a master's degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Tess Joosse
Scientific American Magazine Vol 325 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Bubble Power” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 325 No. 5 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1121-16b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe