To Correspondents

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


N. S., of Mass —We understood you to mean, by the double bearing in axlea, u the axle divided and having two eide and two central bearings, like the one patented by R. Stephenso " The double bearings on each side have been in use a considerable time. If the generator was merely claimed for saving the excess of heat not ued, we should not have found any fault. We shall endeavor to give jou th other information soon. G. r. W., of R. I.—If you millreferto the Sci Am. No 34, you will find a description of Gardner's axle, which embraces the same contrivance as yours. H R., of 111.—There is nothing new in your coup ling for cars ; 1he invention is old and well O C, of Ohio—We advtee yau not to expend money upon your Safety R it. Track; it is probably pa-tentabLe. but we think you could notget it in.trodu ced ; several plaos equall as good have "ksen proposed to effect the same object, none of which have been adopted. B. S,, of Oonn.—We cannot tell the power of jour wheel, but if you multiply the quantity ia pounds discharged per minute, by tie perpendicular height and divide that by 33,t00, jou will obtain -the hoise power of the water : one wheel will give asmucha-B 20 per ceat, more than another. S. W. G , of Conn.—We could not tell you the size of bar, for we have never used an electro-magnet capable of raising GOOOlbs. More depends on the manner in which the magnet is made, than the size of the bar : the finer the wire the better the magnet; it will take about 40 cups of a Groves' battery to work the force you rectuire. L. 1?'. H., of Tt.—Your me'hod of hanging a saw without a sash is entirely different from that described in the Sci. Am. to which you refer ; we have never seen an arrangement of the kind you speak of; weseeno reason why youare not entitled to a patent. W R. H., of Wis—Heat oil to as high a degree of heat as possible nithout setting it on fire, dip in your steel squares f or a few minutes, then take them out and dip them in cold water; in this way you will be able to temper them. A. A. H , of N. Y.- -Your arroyi'ment for a clamp has been used quite frequently for other purposes than the one for which you einpioy it; its application for that purpose does not produce a resul t that would enlitleyou to letters patent; you had better not make ti'i application. S. W., of Pa.—No circular railway would be allowed in a i'ark in this city ; a ton weight cannot propel more than a ton weight, and it would all depend on the height the weight had to fall, for velocity ; bodies fill at the rate of 16 feet during the first second ; you could not operate your car on a level by the weight of the passengers G. B , Jr., of Md—Weareafraid you cannot obtain a patent for your composition, as nearly all the substances employed by you have been used by others ; when you come here we will talk over the matter. Money received on account of Patent Office business for the week ending Saturday, July 9 :— W. 1'. T., of N, Y, $25 j J. McC , of N Y., $20 ; P. B. ., of Me.. $55; W. G., Jr., of Ohio. $30 ; L. B. A., of Pa., $25 ; C. D , of 111., $10 ; D. B. M., of N. Y., $30. Specifications and drawings belonging to parties with the following initials have been forwarded to the Patent Office during the week ending Saturday July 9 :— C, D.. of 111; D. H , of Ky.; L. B. A., of Pa ; B. F. H , of 111.; W. V. 1., of N. Y.: J. McC, of N. Y.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 44This article was published with the title “To Correspondents” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 44 (), p. 350
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07161853-350d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe