To Correspondents

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


V. L. M., of Pa.—Your last invention submitted to us has been longer known (but not in use) than the one suggested to us before. The invention of Dr. Townsend, illustrated on page 241, Vol. 2, Scientific American, describes yeur last proposition ex* aetlj, and the placing of canvas curtains around the edges of the cars and allowing them to drop near the track, is an invention in use on some of our railroads at the present time. So your previous sug gestion is not new. The use of curtains as applied on the New Jersey Railroad are very effectual in preventing the dust from rising, and is the best contrivance we have seen for the purpose—the most effectual for the smallest expense, Don't be discouraged—try again—you hit upon one good idea if it was not new. S. ? , of Pa.—you had better send us a model of your improvement for examination. L. K., of Mass.—The engine and bailer which we have advertised for few weeks back has been sold. E. F. ?1 , of Vt.—If you have got an invention on bank bill paper that will render it impossible to counterfeit or alter bills printed upon it you have a valuable answer. Supposing you send us a fifty dollar bill upon some good specie paying bank that is printed upon your paper, that we may have occu-cular demonstration that what you say of jour in-vention is not overrated. H. H., of Pa,—We have seen no other'account of Fischer's Ram than the one you quote from Ew-feank's Hydraulics, page 371. 'One-third,' pobrably should read 'two-thirds.' No hydraulic ram can raise a larger amount of water than escapee, higher than the source. Three millea above Sohaffhausen at Lauffen is a cataract about 100 feet in height The basin or air chamber, we should think, was at the base of the altar. F. W. ? , of Ohio.—Can you inform us anything new about Cashart's Turn Table? He appears not to have a patent. G- Y., of Md,—Your method of preventing steam boiler explosions is quite well understood j no patent could be secured on it, it is an old contrivance. N. W. P., of Pa.—We do not think there is any chance for you to obtain a patent on the method of securing plastering to brick walls. Our opinion is that it is not the subject of a patent. R. ?. ?., of Ohio —The subject of celestial photography is one worthy of attention. We have not made the microscopical examination which you speak of There are sometimes 4 sun dogs seen, as you will find by consulting any good work on me-meteorological phenomena. Money received on account of Patent Office business for the week ending Saturday, Aug 20:— W. McB., of Ohio, $55 ; L. C, of Miss . $55 ; W D. C. &Son, N. ? , $2b ; F. C, & 8, of N- Y-, $100; G. W. 0., of Q-a., $25 ; T. D.. of Ala., $15; J. W. 8.. of Mich., $30; ? g , of 111., $20 ; N. R. of 111, $35 ;U S. C, of N. Y,$55. Specifications and drawings belonging to parties with the following initials have been forwarded to the Patent Office during the week ending Saturia Aug 20 :— D. B. M, of ?. ? ; D. W. 0. & "Son, ?. ?.; ?. D. ? , of Ohio ; T. D.. of Ala. ; G.B. T., of Ohio ; G. S. C.,of N. Y.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 50This article was published with the title “To Correspondents” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 50 (), p. 399
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08271853-399

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe