Genetically Modified Tobacco Could Smoke Other Crops as Energy Source

Researchers have successfully tested genetic manipulations to increase oil accumulation in the leaves of tobacco plants

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Tobacco plants produce abundant biomass in more than 100 countries and could -- with certain genetic modifications -- be used to produce abundant biofuels, researchers say.

Researchers at the Biotechnology Foundation Laboratories of Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, have successfully tested genetic manipulations to increase oil accumulation in the leaves of tobacco plants, according to a paper published online in Plant Biotechnology Journal.

"In the search for alternative biofuel plant resources, tobacco has been largely overlooked as it is considered primarily as an expensive crop grown for smoking," researchers Vyacheslav Andrianov and Nikolai Borisjuk wrote.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"When grown for energy production instead of smoking, tobacco can generate a large amount of inexpensive biomass more efficiently than almost any other agricultural crop," the researchers wrote.

In most plants, biofuel oil is extracted from the seeds rather than the leaves or stems. But while tobacco plants produce very oily seeds, they do not make large numbers of them, the researchers said.

To make tobacco plants more attractive as a feedstock, they tested two genetic modifications to shift oil production and accumulation into the tobacco plant's large and plentiful leaves.

By engineering plants to overexpress one gene, the researchers doubled the fatty acids extracted from a plant to 5.8 percent of the dry biomass weight for one tobacco strain and 6 percent for another.

A second genetic change made the plant accumulate up to 6.8 percent per dry weight of extracted fatty acids, they reported.

The researchers said further experimentation should be done to test whether making both of the changes in a single plant yields the full cumulative increase.

But if either of those gains could be secured at a large scale, tobacco could become a useful biofuel feedstock, they said.

Citing a 2008 study, the researchers said that if one assumed a conservative harvest of 170 metric tons per hectare for about 20 tons of dry biomass, engineered tobacco plants with 6 percent fatty acid by dry weight would produce at least twice as much biodiesel as a hectare of soybeans.

Extracting oil from the green parts of a plant is not as well understood as pressing it out of seeds, the authors noted, presenting a hurdle to commercial production. But the process could be expected to yield glycerin as a valuable byproduct, and the pressed leaves could be fermented to make ethanol, as well, they said.

"By generating both biofuel oil and ethanol, tobacco has the potential to produce more energy per hectare than any other non-food crop," they conclude.

Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe