Too Much and Not Enough

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the February 2011 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The growing familiarity of the statistics does little to ease the painful realization of how disturbing they are. About a third of Americans are overweight, and another third are obese—a jump from just 13 percent obese in 1962—and as a nation we are growing fatter all the time. The excess weight has severe consequences. It causes more than 160,000 additional deaths in the U.S. annually and exacts a financial toll: health care for a person who is 70 pounds or more overweight can cost an additional $30,000 over a lifetime. Many other countries, in both the industrial and developing worlds, are seeing similar trends.

At the same time, in a crowded and en­vironmentally stressed world—with global population rising from 6.9 billion today to an estimated 9.3 billion in 2050—humanity is going to need to find sustainable sources of protein and nutrients.

In this edition, two feature articles take on the issues surrounding these very disparate food challenges. Our cover story, “How to Fix the Obesity Crisis,” by David H. Freedman, explains the complex web of factors—social, environmental, genetic and economic—that led us to this situation. Someday science may find a pharmaceutical answer to weight gain. But until then, we have only the currently available solutions that are best supported by research. What they are may surprise you.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fish farms, as now practiced along coastlines, have had a controversial role in satisfying our hunger for seafood, given their track record of problematic environmental practices. With many wild fisheries collapsing from commercial overharvesting and the continuing difficulties of sustainably raising livestock such as cows, pigs and chickens on land, however,
we need better answers. Could new offshore fish farms—assuming they can function efficiently—be a productive direction to explore? Contributing editor Sarah Simp­son’s report takes a look at that question. See “The Blue Food Revolution.”

Changing topics, I’d like to update you on two items that I mentioned in my letter last issue. We have now introduced an app for the iPhone, called Scientific American Advances; we plan other mobile versions later this year. And by the time you see this issue, our first app for the iPad will be available for download. Called “Origins and Endings,” it tells compelling stories about the cosmos, life and human innovations through feature articles, videos, interactive informational graphics, audio and slide shows from our archives. And as always, we are eager to receive your feedback.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 304 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Too Much and Not Enough” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 304 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican022011-3xgxi9yJ2tHExdslS2DNNu

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe