New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Top 10 Cities for Green Living

Not all cities are created equal. As part of Scientific American's "Cities" special topic issue, for the next five days we will feature recently compiled lists ranking cities across the U.S. on aspects of green living, pollution, health and technology. Today, we feature rankings of cities based on green living, Part 1 of 5

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Many Americans root for their hometowns, whether they do so by supporting a sports team, participating in local government or just bragging about their origins and environs. Even those who have lukewarm feelings about where they live would agree on one thing: not all cities are created equal. As part of its "Cities" special issue, Scientific American has gathered lists ranking metropolises across the U.S. on aspects of green living, pollution, health and technology. 

Today we feature lists that rank cities based on their green living opportunities, and then add up each city's rankings to find the best overall green living cities. Admittedly, this summed result may be invalid. (For starters, what if other lists were generated and added in to change the outcome or what if the methods across each list are inconsistent?) We think, however, it still offers a benchmark worthy of consideration.

Greenest Thinking


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


  • New York City

  • Las Vegas

  • San Francisco

  • Washington, D.C.

  • Albuquerque, N.M.

  • Boston

  • Gainesville, Fla.

  • Chicago

  • Philadelphia

  • Baltimore

The Daily Beast compiled this ranking based on residents' survey responses. To make the "greenest thinking" list, each city had to contain more than 100,000 citizens, a high percentage of whom self-identify as eco-conscious. A relatively high number of residents also had to state that they recycle, ride public transportation regularly and use solar power. Each city's score, however, dropped when citizens responded that they were unconcerned about environmental issues.

Most Energy-Efficient Buildings

  • Los Angeles

  • Washington, D.C.

  • San Francisco

  • Denver

  • Chicago

  • Houston

  • Lakeland, Fla.

  • Dallas–Fort Worth

  • Atlanta

  • New York City

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency created this ranking of American cities. These energy-efficient commercial buildings had to reduce energy use although still perform well in comparison with similar buildings. (FromThe Huffington Post)

Best Public Transportation Systems

  • Denver–Aurora, Colo.

  • New York City-Newark, N.J.

  • Los Angeles–Long Beach–Santa Ana, Calif.

  • Boston, Mass.–New Hampshire–Rhode Island

  • Portland, Ore.

  • San Jose, Calif.

  • Salt Lake City

  • San Diego

  • Seattle

  • Honolulu

 

To qualify for this U.S. News & World Report list, cities had to have public transportation systems that stood out from the crowd. The magazine based its ranking not only on how many people used any given system, but also on that system's quality. For example, cities that provided multiple travel options (buses, light rail, metro, elevated trains and so on) could increase their score.

Most Bikeable

  • Minneapolis

  • Portland, Ore.

  • Boulder, Colo.

  • Seattle

  • Eugene, Ore.

  • San Francisco

  • Madison, Wis.

  • New York City

  • Tucson, Ariz.

  • Chicago

Bicycling.com based its list on how the city's streets and community treated bikers. Having segregated bike lanes and public bike racks helped a city's rank, but these cities also support bike culture and possess good stores for bicycles and biking equipment.

Most Walkable

  • New York City

  • San Francisco, Calif.

  • Boston

  • Chicago

  • Philadelphia

  • Seattle

  • Washington, D.C.

  • Miami, Fla.

  • Minneapolis

  • Oakland, Calif.

To find the most walkable cities in the U.S., Walk Score started small, by analyzing the score of each individual city block. A block's walkability depended on its proximity to amenities such as grocery stores, weighted by the local population density. Blocks combined to help Walk Score find neighborhood walkability, which in turn added up to a city's total walkability.

Top 10 Overall Green Living Performances

  • New York City

  • San Francisco

  • Washington, D.C.

  • Boston

  • Los Angeles

  • Chicago

  • Denver

  • Portland, Ore.

  • Seattle

  • Minneapolis

These cities rank highly on more than one of the above green-living lists.

Not all of the above lists were created using conventional statistical or scientific methods, therefore their validity should be suspect. Scientific American gathered the lists from several online sources. To earn a place on the "overall performance" list, cities had to make repeat appearances on multiple lists, and earned points based on their rankings. Each city's points were added up to arrive at the overall score.

Tomorrow: Part 2—The Top 10 Healthiest Cities

Sophie Bushwick was formerly the technology editor at Scientific American. She makes frequent appearances on radio shows such as Science Friday and television networks, including CBS, MSNBC and National Geographic. She has more than a decade of experience as a science journalist based in New York City and previously worked at outlets such as Popular Science,Discover and Gizmodo. Follow Bushwick on X (formerly Twitter) @sophiebushwick

More by Sophie Bushwick

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe