Tornadoes at Night and in the Southeast Are Especially Deadly

Population density and a prevalence of mobile homes make the region a hotspot for tornado deaths

A lighted view at night of tornado damage in Mayfield, KY.

An aerial view of debris and structural damage is seen at the Mayfield Consumer Products candle factory as search and rescue operations underway after tornado hit Mayfield, Kentucky on December 12, 2021.

Editor’s Note (3/27/23): A deadly tornado struck Mississippi in the evening hours last Friday. This December 2021 story explores why tornadoes that strike at night and in the Southeast are often more fatal.

It was around 9:30 P.M., hours past sunset, when a violent tornado leveled the town of Mayfield, Ky., on December 10. The exceptionally long-lasting twister was part of a rare December outbreak that raked through several Midwestern and Southern states that night. Though the storms were well forecast, and warnings were issued relatively early, at least 89 people have been confirmed dead, with some still unaccounted for.

Nighttime tornadoes can be particularly deadly—and not just because more people are likely to be asleep. To break down the reasons—and explain why the Southeast is particularly prone to nocturnal storms—Scientific American spoke with Stephen Strader, an atmospheric scientist and hazards geographer at Villanova University, where he studies how the risks of tornadoes and other severe weather overlap with social vulnerability.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[An edited transcript of the interview follows.]

Are there any meteorological differences between daytime and nighttime tornadoes?

Daytime storms that produce tornadoes tend to have more instability. However, once nighttime hits, we have something called a low-level jet stream that intensifies as the boundary layer (the [portion] of the troposphere) begins to decouple from the rest of the atmosphere. This strong, often southerly low-level jet carries moisture from the Gulf of Mexico with it, fueling thunderstorms under the cover of darkness when that daytime instability has waned. In the case of [last] Friday’s event, the low-level jet was very strong, and there was substantial low-level wind shear [in which winds blow in different directions at different levels of the atmosphere] in the environment. These two factors can be quite common after dark in the Southeast.

What makes the Southeast particularly prone to nighttime tornadoes?

The Southeast is, first off, no stranger to tornado events. We like to think of that classic Wizard of Oz scene of the sepia-tone tornado dancing in the landscape of Kanas. The reality is the Southeast—and you can go back to April 27, 2011 [the deadliest day of an event in which 360 tornadoes formed across the region and 320 people were killed], or the 1974 Super Outbreak—the region is no stranger to big killer events. That’s because, by the time a large-scale synoptic system makes its way across the country and evolves over time, it typically reaches the Southeast right during those evening hours. You end up with faster storm speeds; you end up with tornadoes moving at 60 miles per hour rather than five miles per hour in the plains. You also have more moisture to work with, so you end up with wetter storms. A lot of ingredients play a role. But the big thing that I always tell people is: If I had to ask you where tornadoes are most common, you’re going to say Kansas or Oklahoma and maybe Texas. But if you look at where tornado fatalities are most common, it’s Alabama, Mississippi. There’s a mismatch there, and that mismatch isn’t a meteorological one. It’s actually a societal issue. And it has to do with vulnerability and exposure.

What are some factors that make this a societal issue?

Population density is the first and foremost thing: there are many more people in the southeastern U.S. The other factor that plays a role is that there are more frequent nocturnal [tornado] events there. Poverty is greater. And the big issue in the Southeast is that mobile manufactured housing densities are much higher than in any other nation in the world or in [other parts of] the U.S. The national average for the percentage of homes that are mobile homes is about 6 percent, but in states like Alabama, it’s upward of 13 to 14 percent. Land use and zoning play a role as well, because most manufactured homes everywhere outside the U.S. are found in mobile home parks designated for that. In the Southeast, you have 80 percent of those manufactured homes that are not in mobile home parks—they’re in isolated plots of land in rural areas. This creates more targets for these tornadoes to hit. So when you have a long-track tornado, instead of going through a bunch of cornfields and wheat fields, it’s going through the hearts of smaller cities and rural areas that are a little bit more populated than they normally would be elsewhere.

You are updating research done in 2008 that looked at the differences in fatality rates between daytime and nighttime tornadoes. That study found that death rates for the latter had not declined as fast as those for tornadoes overall. Does that still hold true?

I and Walker Ashley [of Northern Illinois University] are revisiting this, adding the next 15 years of data onto this and actually taking a bit of a different perspective on it. The scary thing that I saw was ... the percentage of fatalities that occur between daytime tornadoes and nocturnal tornadoes is going up. So we’re seeing a greater percentage of people dying in these nocturnal events. If you look at all tornado events that occur during daytime, that’s going down. What we’re seeing is this difference between day and night really playing a role in the likelihood of you being killed.

The other thing that’s scary is, [in the 2008 paper] Ashley found that tornadoes that occur at night are 2.5 times more likely to result in a fatality. I thought maybe that had gotten better. And what we found is it has not: it’s maybe gotten a little bit worse.

Most of us also, during the daytime, go to work. So the exposure side of things is changing throughout the day as well. What we typically see is, at nighttime, a more dispersed population. It’s a bit scary—but if anything, the problem’s gotten worse.

Andrea Thompson is senior desk editor for life science at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and earth sciences. She has been covering these issues for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe