New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Tourist Boats Force Killer Whales to ¿Shout¿ above the Din

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Whalewatching allows humans a glimpse of magnificent creatures in their natural habitat. But as the pastime becomes more popular, a new study suggests, noise from the boat traffic may be drowning out the animals¿ ability to hear one another¿s calls.

A. Rus Hoelzel of the University of Durham in England and his colleagues examined the vocalizations made by killer whales from the coastal waters of Washington State, analyzing calls uttered in the presence and absence of boat engine noise from recordings made during three time periods over the past 25 years. They observed no difference in whale calls recorded about 25 years ago and 15 years ago. But the most recent set of recordings, made between 2001 and 2003, revealed that whales changed the characteristics of their calls when boats were around, making them 15 percent longer compared to the calls they made without such background noise. Boat traffic in the region increased fivefold during the 1990s, the team notes, with groups of killer whales now followed by as many as 22 tourist vessels a day. The results of the study, published today in the journal Nature, suggest that there exists a critical level of noise beyond which the animals¿ performance becomes impaired, forcing them to adapt their behavior in order to be heard above the din.

Killer whales are highly social animals and are thought to call to one another while jointly foraging for food. Although there is no direct evidence that the increased level of engine noise interferes with communication, the researchers note that the killer whale population in the area they study has been declining since 1996. "Whale watching is a really constructive thing," Hoelzel says. "It educates the public and it¿s a good conservation tool. But we need to do the research to see the kind of impact we¿re having and to regulate it effectively."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe