Tourist Boats Force Killer Whales to ¿Shout¿ above the Din

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Whalewatching allows humans a glimpse of magnificent creatures in their natural habitat. But as the pastime becomes more popular, a new study suggests, noise from the boat traffic may be drowning out the animals¿ ability to hear one another¿s calls.

A. Rus Hoelzel of the University of Durham in England and his colleagues examined the vocalizations made by killer whales from the coastal waters of Washington State, analyzing calls uttered in the presence and absence of boat engine noise from recordings made during three time periods over the past 25 years. They observed no difference in whale calls recorded about 25 years ago and 15 years ago. But the most recent set of recordings, made between 2001 and 2003, revealed that whales changed the characteristics of their calls when boats were around, making them 15 percent longer compared to the calls they made without such background noise. Boat traffic in the region increased fivefold during the 1990s, the team notes, with groups of killer whales now followed by as many as 22 tourist vessels a day. The results of the study, published today in the journal Nature, suggest that there exists a critical level of noise beyond which the animals¿ performance becomes impaired, forcing them to adapt their behavior in order to be heard above the din.

Killer whales are highly social animals and are thought to call to one another while jointly foraging for food. Although there is no direct evidence that the increased level of engine noise interferes with communication, the researchers note that the killer whale population in the area they study has been declining since 1996. "Whale watching is a really constructive thing," Hoelzel says. "It educates the public and it¿s a good conservation tool. But we need to do the research to see the kind of impact we¿re having and to regulate it effectively."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe