New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Towering Sequoias Are Even Bigger Than Thought, Laser Scans Suggest

Laser light reveals the structure of the planet’s tallest trees

Coast redwoods Muir Woods National Park

Coast redwoods (Sequoia sempervirens), tree canopy, Muir Woods National Park, California, USA.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

California's coastal redwoods, Sequoia sempervirens, are the tallest trees on earth. But measuring their precise dimensions—which is key to determining how much climate-altering carbon they store as biomass—is fraught with uncertainty. Widely used scaling equations between trunk diameter and volume are based on limited sampling of much smaller trees, given that few people are willing to don a climbing harness and take measurements 30 stories off the ground. Now, for the first time, researchers have surveyed S. sempervirens using laser scanning, an automated technique that yields accurate measurements of a tree's structure and volume.

Mathias Disney, an environmental scientist at University College London, and his colleagues assessed 145 redwoods for a study published in Scientific Reports. They fired billions of near-infrared laser pulses at the trees from multiple directions, recording the time it took the pulses to bounce back. This process let them assemble a detailed map of each tree, showing burrs, twigs and other features as small as a few centimeters. “This is giving us a new perspective on the three-dimensional structure of trees,” Disney says.

Credit: From “New 3D Measurements of Large Redwood Trees for Biomass and Structure,” by Mathias Disney et al., in Nature Scientific Reports, Vol. 10; October 15, 2020


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers found that coastal redwoods tended to be about 30 percent larger by volume than published scaling relations predicted. The authors suggest this discrepancy might be because some S. sempervirens sprout additional trunks as they age, a process called reiteration. Based on their observations, Disney and his colleagues have established new scaling relations between tree diameter and volume for the species.

Laser scanning can increase knowledge of old-growth forests that is important in conservation efforts, says Anil Raj Kizha, a forest operations scientist at the University of Maine, who was not involved in the research. “In the coming five to 10 years,” he says, “this is going to be more widespread.”

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe