Toxic Together: Depression and Heart Disease

Depression and heart disease are most lethal when combined

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Clinicians have long suspected that depression worsens cardiac symptoms, but recent research suggests this combination is even more dangerous than previously believed. A study published in the journal Heart found that on any given day participants with both depression and heart disease were nearly five times more likely to die than their healthy peers. Depression alone doubled mortality risk, and heart disease increased risk by only two thirds.

The study authors evaluated about 6,000 subjects, employing statistical models to see if other factors, such as age and medication use, affected the results. Surprisingly, heart disease became a relatively insignificant mortality risk once these other factors were accounted for, but the combination of depression and heart disease remained lethal. “It shows the pervasiveness of depression,” says Martica Hall, a psychologist at the University of Pittsburgh and a study co-author. Indeed, studies indicate at least 20 percent of the 17 million Americans with heart disease also suffer from depression. The mechanism behind depression’s lethality is unclear, but researchers surmise that inflammatory factors associated with the brain’s stress response play a role.

Erica Westly is an author and journalist based in Seattle. Her work has appeared in Scientific American, Nature Medicine and the New York Times, among other outlets.

More by Erica Westly
SA Mind Vol 21 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Toxic Together: Depression and Heart Disease” in SA Mind Vol. 21 No. 6 (), p. 6
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0111-6

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe