Traces of Gravity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Astronomers seem to invoke collisions, however improbable, when they cannot explain odd features of the solar system. Triton circles Neptune in reverse of its sister moons, for example, and the prior best guess was that Triton flew in from afar and knocked another moon out, like a well-struck cue ball. But if a pair of objects orbiting each other waltzed past Neptune, the one moving slower relative to the planet could have been snared by its gravity and begun orbiting the planet, and the other would have continued on its way, argue researchers in the May 11 Nature. Many such binary pairs have been spotted on the solar system's periphery over the past few years. Similarly, gravity, rather than a glancing blow from a protoplanet, might also account for Uranus and its moons' 98-degree axial tilt relative to the planet's orbital plane. Based on accepted trajectories for the young gas giants, a simulation reported in the April 27 issue of Nature indicates that the wobbling spin of Saturn could have nudged Uranus on its side during close encounters between the pair.

JR Minkel was a news reporter for Scientific American.

More by JR Minkel
Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Traces of Gravity” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 1 (), p. 33
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0706-33c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe