New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Tracking an Ancient Killer

The case was cold--the bones in the mass grave were 70 million years old. But critical clues pointed to the killer's identity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One body rests on its left side, head and neck pulled back toward the pelvis--a classic death pose. The arms and legs are still in their anatomically correct positions, but closer inspection reveals that bones of the hands and feet are dislocated, although most parts are present and accounted for. The skull, too, is somewhat disjointed, and here again the component pieces lie near one another. Curiously, the tip of the tail is missing altogether. Nearby rest more corpses in markedly different states of preservation and disarray. Some are still largely intact, others represented by only a skull, a shoulder blade, a single limb bone. Did the unfortunate creatures die here, or were they brought together after their demise? Did they all perish at the same instant, or did their deaths transpire over time? And what killed them?

Our team of Malagasy and American paleontologists and geologists started asking such questions as soon as we discovered the mass grave in the summer of 2005 in the ancient sediments of northwestern Madagascar, an island whose Venetian-red soils inspired its nickname, the Great Red Island. We turned up some intriguing information as we searched for the answers, but how we went about the task is perhaps as interesting as what we found.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe