Treating a Deadly Lung Disease with a Little Help from Amoebas

Microscopic soil dwellers hint at a way to reverse COPD symptoms

Dictyostelium discoideum in its fruiting body stage.

Dictyostelium discoideum in its fruiting body stage.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which includes emphysema, chronic bronchitis and other conditions, is among the top causes of death in the U.S. No current therapies can prevent or reverse COPD. But thanks to amoebas, a new study has identified genes that may help protect lung cells against such harm—and potentially reverse COPD symptoms.

“I see COPD patients, so this was something very important to me,” says the study's lead author Corrine Kliment, a lung disease researcher and physician at the University of Pittsburgh. To search for potentially useful genes, Kliment and her team turned to the soil-dwelling amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.

Amoebas have many genes that are also found in humans, but the microscopic creatures have much shorter life cycles—so scientists can use them to quickly spot genes of interest before studying mammalian models. “We often joke that humans are just amoebas with hair,” says study senior author Douglas Robinson, a researcher at Johns Hopkins University.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


About 75 percent of COPD deaths are linked to smoking cigarettes. So Robinson's laboratory (in four short weeks) screened 35,000 amoebas, whose genes were modified to overproduce a range of different proteins, to see if any of those proteins might protect the amoebas from smoke damage. When researchers exposed all the amoebas to cigarette smoke extract, they found the ones that fared best were overproducing certain proteins important for cellular metabolism.

Next they looked for those same proteins in human and mouse lung cells. They found that cells from smokers, COPD patients and mice with long-term smoke exposure produced less of one of those proteins in particular, called ANT2.

And the researchers were surprised to observe that ANT2 seemed to be playing another, nonmetabolic role as well. Looking at the lung cells under a microscope, Kliment saw ANT2 accumulating on their surfaces around hairlike projections called cilia, which sweep back and forth to clear mucus from lungs. In COPD, these cilia cannot move well; mucus then builds up and can cause respiratory failure. Kliment and her colleagues found that ANT2 boosted hydration, making it easier for cilia to sweep away mucus. Their study appeared in the Journal of Cell Science.

Kliment, Robinson and others now aim to create drugs and gene therapies that increase ANT2 production, which they hope could ease mucus buildup to reverse COPD symptoms. Robinson and some collaborators are working to start a company that will use amoebas to screen candidates for future therapies, including ones for COPD.

Gregg Duncan, a lung disease researcher at the University of Maryland, who was not involved in the study, says he is optimistic that this work may help those with COPD: “It's nice to see an opportunity to reverse the symptoms in a more durable, long-term way.”

Sam Jones is a biomedical scientist turned science writer, editor and producer based in Washington, D.C.

More by Sam Jones
Scientific American Magazine Vol 325 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Insights from Amoebas” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 325 No. 1 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0721-21

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe