Treating Trauma on a Grand Scale

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The fifth anniversary of the World Trade Center's collapse on 9/11, the second of the Indian Ocean tsunami, and the first anniversary of Hurricane Katrina's devastation of New Orleans recently put the issue of disaster preparedness back in the headlines. But despite a growing body of research and experience, the best way to be ready for the mental health effects of disasters is still unclear. “This is a field that is just coming of age,” says Barbara Lopes Cardozo, a psychiatrist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A surge of new publications on disaster psychiatry in prestige journals is providing new data and insights.

Craig Katz of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine was part of a team providing services to rescue workers from 9/11. They found that half the patients answered mental health questionnaires in a way that triggered a follow-up exam, and half of those needed and accepted treatment. “We were surprised to see in the years that followed that those numbers never dropped off and the need never dropped off.”

Researchers studying American soldiers have documented cognitive changes in healthy troops before and after deployment to Iraq, including the development of deficits in attention, learning and memory. But the same soldiers demonstrate an improvement in reaction time, suggesting they cannot shake off the state of hypervigilance their duty in hostile territory required. Although these mental changes fall short of clinical diagnosis of mental disorder, they may set the stage for later problems.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Katrina provided lessons about how the entire mental health support system can collapse, even in rich, developed countries. Victims who saw and suffered enormous losses from the storm had new acute mental health needs. At the same time, many mental health workers had fled the area.

Cardozo and her colleagues looked at rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults and children after the tsunami. In adults, rates of PTSD declined significantly between two and nine months after the waves hit, but rates in children did not decline, suggesting they are at heightened risk for later psychiatric problems.

Most experts agree that the field next needs to move from epidemiology to interventional trials, trying different techniques to treat victims and monitoring the effect on mental health in the long term. But they are less confident that the current interest will translate into sustained support for large-scale trials. “In public health, mental issues are given less priority than physical ones. And in policy work, interest in disaster planning is episodic,” Katz says.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe