Tree Termination

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Trees in the western U.S. have died off at an increasing rate over the past few decades, finds Phillip J. van Mantgem of the U.S. Geological Survey and his colleagues. They studied various plots in three regions: the Pacific Northwest, California and the continental interior near the Rocky Mountains. The culprit seems to be locally higher temperatures, which decrease the available water and boost the activity of a bark-damaging fungus. As a result, trees on average are younger and smaller—and less able to hold on to carbon.

Annual number of deaths per 1,000 trees in:

1984: 7.1


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


2001: 11.4

Number of trees in study area in:

1984: 58,736

2001: 47,641

Calculated increase in annual number of deaths per 1,000 trees: 4

Number of years for the tree mortality rate to double in:

Pacific Northwest: 17

California: 25

Continental interior: 29

SOURCE: Science, January 23, 2009

Scientific American Magazine Vol 300 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Tree Termination” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 300 No. 4 (), p. 30
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0409-30d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe