Trial of Breech-Loading Arms

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It will be recollected by most of our readers that Congress, at the last session, made an appropriation of $25,000 for the purpose of altering the government muzzle-loading firearms to breech-loading, and authorized a trial to be made of all breech-loading arms susceptible of adaptation to this change, whose owners were willing to compete, with a view of ascertaining their relative merits. The Board of Ordnance officers, consisting of Col. Ripley, Captain Maynadier, and Major Ramsay, detailed by the Secretary of War to examine and report on such plans as might be submitted by inventors, have lately concluded their examination, and it is presumed will soon furnish their report to the Secretary. The programme of the recent trial, which took place at West Point, was as follows : 20 rounds for accuracy, at 100 yards ; 80 rounds more, to make 100, for endurance ; 20 rounds for rapidity ; 20 rounds for accuracy at 600 yards ; 3 rounds for penetration. The competing guns, named in the order in which they were filed before the Board, were Morse's, Joslyn's,JMt. Storm's, Merrill's, May-nard's, and Sharp's ; and all of them had been altered from muzzle to breech-loading, Storm's having been altered from an old U. S. rifle, and although,' in consequence, somewhat rough in appearance, elicited marked evidences of approval from the general ease and facility with which it was handled throughout the trial. The following is the tabular statement, as prepared by the correspondent of the New York Times, the guns bSing placed in the order of their apparent superiority in each branch of the trial : TWENTY BOCNPB POE A00UEA0Y, AT ONE HUNDRED YAEDS. Mt. Storm............ 11 Morse.................. 4 Joslyn................ 2 Maynard............... 5 Sharp.................. 31 Merrill.................. 6 FOE ENDCBANOE— ONE HUNDRED ROUNDS. All the guns stood the test in this respect, but Sharp's evidently worked hard, and Morse had twenty-eight miss-fires. EAPIDITT—TWENTY BOUNDS. M. S. if. S. l..Mt. Storm....... 2 10 4..Joslyn........... 2 65 2..Merrill.......... 2 25 5..Morse........... 3 40 3..Sharp............ 2 45 6..Maynard....... 4 15 TWENTY EODND8 FOE ACCCEAOY—BIX HCNDBED YABDB. Balls in target. Sails in target. l..Mt. Storm.......... 11 4..Joalyn.............. 5 2..Sharp.........-..... 7 5..Maynard............ 3 3..Morse.............. 7 6..Merrill.............. 3 PENETEATION—INCH BOARDS, INCH APABT, THIBTY YAEDS. Mt. Storm.............. 1 Joslyn.................. 4 Morse................... 2 Sharp.................. 5 Merrill.................. 3| Maynard............... 6 This result being estimated by allowing for different weight of powder and ball, and not merely for the number of inches passed through, which were in the order of firing first named, to wit: THREE ROUNDS EACH. PT&ight Wright Rounds. of ball, afp'der. ,------------'------------, Total. grains, graitu. 12 3 inches. Morse...... J44 70 12% 12% 13M 37% Joslyn...... 660 60 VOi 11 9 32X Mt. Storm.. 600 60 12 11K UK 34$ Merrill..... 744 70 13 \%y, MX % Maynard... 744 70 11M 11 Wi SSK Sharp....... 551) 70 10 11X 10 SIX After these results were obtained, Storm proposed that all the guns should be immersed in water for a stated period, and afterwards tried, to see what effect this exposure, to which they are likely to be subjected to in p ctice, would have, but this was objected to. He also proposed that they should be thrown against rocks, or down precipices, to further test their powers of endurance, but all refused compliance to this course, except Sharp. Four of the guns tried were loaded with the usual cartridge, and Mt. Storm's had the additional advantage of capability of being loaded with loose powder and ball.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 49This article was published with the title “Trial of Breech-Loading Arms” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 49 (), p. 390
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican08141858-390

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe