New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Trump Plans White House Science Fair, Extending an Obama Tradition

News comes ahead of nationwide marches supporting research and evidence-based policies

At the White House science fair in 2014, participants demonstrate an "ice search and rescue" vehicle.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

WASHINGTON — The White House still doesn’t have a top science adviser, but it has a science fair in the works.

A White House official said Friday that the science fair, an annual tradition started by former President Barack Obama in 2010, will continue under President Trump. No date has been finalized.

The news, first reported by CBS, comes ahead of a science-centric weekend in Washington. As part of the March for Science, thousands are expected to descend on the National Mall and at satellite marches around the country on Saturday to promote evidence-based policymaking and stress the importance of federally funded basic science research. While organizers have stressed that the event is nonpartisan, it is widely viewed as a rebuke of the current administration, whose policies on climate change and other issues have generated controversy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Obama’s final science fair in 2016 featured exhibits including a portable diagnostic test for Ebola, an ocean energy harvester, and a robot designed to clean up the New York City subway.

Ivanka Trump, the president’s daughter and one of his key advisers, has advocated alongside Education Secretary Betsy DeVos for increased youth engagement in STEM fields.

But other signs about Trump’s commitment to science have been less comforting for the scientific community. His 2018 budget blueprint included a $5.8 billion cut from budget for the National Institutes of Health, and even congressional Republicans balked at his desire to cut an additional $1.2 billion from the still-unresolved 2017 budget.

Beyond funding, science advocates have expressed concern that the administration has not yet appointed a director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Obama announced the appointment of his top science adviser, traditionally the head of that office, in December 2008, before his inauguration. The president’s lone science and technology hire, according to the New York Times, is a former adviser to Silicon Valley tech mogul Peter Thiel who has played little role in presidential briefings.

One rumored candidate, Princeton physicist William Happer, has argued that higher atmospheric carbon levels would lead to higher farming productivity and provide a net societal benefit. Trump’s meeting with prominent vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has also generated within the scientific community.

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on April 21, 2017

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe