Trump’s FDA Commissioner Marty Makary resigns

Makary, a face of Trump’s Make America Healthy Again agenda, oversaw the embattled agency as it dealt with vaping, abortion and other issues

Food and Drug Administration commissioner Marty Makary in the White House on December 18, 2025.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Martin “Marty” Makary, one of the most prominent supporters of the Trump administration’s Make America Healthy Again agenda, resigned as Food and Drug Administration commissioner. The reported decision came days after reports emerged that President Donald Trump had green-lit a plan to fire him.

Makary was a surgical oncologist at Johns Hopkins University before Trump tapped him for the drug regulator’s top job. His time at the helm of the FDA was marked by fierce battles over issues such as abortion and the aftermath of major layoffs at the agency. The Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Politico, which was first to report Makary’s resignation, cited an administration source as saying Kyle Diamantas, an FDA food official, will become acting head of the agency.

Makary rose to prominence among conservative leaders for his criticism of public health leaders’ response to the COVID pandemic. Trump nominated him to lead the FDA in November 2024, and he was confirmed in March 2025.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But Makary ran afoul of multiple figures in the administration, including antiabortion advocates, when he said he could have interfered with the approval of the generic form of the abortion pill mifepristone but didn’t, the Wall Street Journal previously reported.

Trump also reportedly clashed with Makary over the latter’s reluctance to approve flavored vape products, which the agency recently approved after they were banned beginning in 2019. Makary seemingly bowed to pressure by allowing the approval; he ultimately stepped down over the decision, the New York Times reported, citing sources “familiar with the matter.”

Under Makary, the FDA has replaced panels of independent experts with people who have contrarian views and strong ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

During his tenure, Makary also oversaw the removal of a serious “black box” warning on estrogen for menopausal women, the banning of artificial food dyes and the rejection of the drug leucovorin as a treatment for autism, though it was approved to treat a rare genetic condition. He has previously mused about making many prescription medications available over the counter, with some exceptions.

Recently, the agency came under fire for failing to approve a promising melanoma treatment despite clear evidence that it was effective, calling the FDA’s drug approval process into question.

Editor’s Note (5/12/26): This is a developing story and may be updated.

Tanya Lewis is senior desk editor for health and medicine at Scientific American. She writes and edits stories for the website and print magazine on topics ranging from COVID to organ transplants. She also appears on Scientific American’s podcast Science Quickly and writes Scientific American’s weekly Health & Medicine newsletter. She has held a number of positions over her nine years at Scientific American, including health editor, assistant news editor and associate editor at Scientific American Mind. Previously, she has written for outlets that include Insider, Wired, Science News and others. She has a degree in biomedical engineering from Brown University and one in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz. Follow her on Bluesky @tanyalewis.bsky.social

More by Tanya Lewis

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe